Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23080267›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of pediatrics2013

Are Indian parents of children with Down syndrome engaged in the blame game?

Mamta N Muranjan, Sweta R Budyal, Henal R Shah

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mamta N MuranjanThe Genetic Clinic, Department of Pediatrics, Seth GS Medical College & KEM Hospital, Parel, Mumbai 400012, India. muranjanmamta@gmail.com
Sweta R Budyal
Henal R Shah
King Edward Memorial Hospital and Seth G.S. Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo study blame ascription among parents of children with Down syndrome and to study its correlation with sociodemographic factors, parental perception of dysmorphisms and parents' knowledge about Down syndrome. This is a prospective, observational, non-interventional case control study.

methodsInterview of biological parents of children with Down syndrome less than 12 y of age was taken. Dysmorphism and parents' feeling of blame was assessed and graded by Likert's scale. Controls were parents of age and gender matched children with non-genetic chronic disorders.

resultsDuring the study period, 50 mothers and 46 fathers of cases and 50 control parents were interviewed. Parents in the study group were older; the mothers were better educated and had more frequent antenatal visits. There was no significant difference in the proportion of parents counseled but genetic counseling was associated with a significantly higher proportion of parents having knowledge about Down syndrome. A higher proportion of parents perceived their child with Down syndrome being dysmorphic. Blame ascription was not significantly different among the two groups and was seen only in a small proportion of parents of cases. When it did occur, it was directed at health professionals.

conclusionsBlame ascription is not frequent in a cohort of Indian parents of children with Down syndrome even when dysmorphism is perceived by parents. Genetic counseling was associated with better knowledge about Down syndrome in the parents.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalAdultCase-Control StudiesChildChild, PreschoolDenial, PsychologicalDown SyndromeFemaleGenetic CounselingHumansIndiaInfantInfant, NewbornInterviews as TopicMaleParents

Identifiers

PMID23080267
OpenAlexW2031410581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.