Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23079810›Full record

ArticleAIDS (London, England)2013

Tenofovir-based regimens associated with less drug resistance in HIV-1-infected Nigerians failing first-line antiretroviral therapy.

Mary-Ann A Etiebet, James Shepherd, Rebecca G Nowak, Man Charurat, Harry Chang, Samuel Ajayi, Olufunmilayo Elegba, Nicaise Ndembi, Alashle Abimiku, Jean K Carr and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS (London, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Cognitive Function Among Antiretroviral Treatment-Naive Individuals Infected With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Subtype G Versus CRF02_AG in Nigeria.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mary-Ann A EtiebetInstitute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, MD, USA.
James Shepherd
Rebecca G Nowak
Man Charurat
Harry Chang
Samuel Ajayi
Olufunmilayo Elegba
Nicaise Ndembi
Alashle Abimiku
Jean K Carr
Lindsay M Eyzaguirre
William A Blattner

Funding

UM-IHV AITRP in NigeriaD43TW001041 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI CHARURAT, MANHATTAN E · 1998 to 2015
$9.2M
FIC NIH HHS 2 D43 TW001041-11FIC NIH HHS D43 TW001041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn resource-limited settings, HIV-1 drug resistance testing to guide antiretroviral therapy (ART) selection is unavailable. We retrospectively conducted genotypic analysis on archived samples from Nigerian patients who received targeted viral load testing to confirm treatment failure and report their drug resistance mutation patterns.

methodsStored plasma from 349 adult patients on non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) regimens was assayed for HIV-1 RNA viral load, and samples with more than 1000 copies/ml were sequenced in the pol gene. Analysis for resistance mutations utilized the IAS-US 2011 Drug Resistance Mutation list.

resultsOne hundred and seventy-five samples were genotyped; the majority of the subtypes were G (42.9%) and CRF02_AG (33.7%). Patients were on ART for a median of 27 months. 90% had the M184V/I mutation, 62% had at least one thymidine analog mutation, and 14% had the K65R mutation. 97% had an NNRTI resistance mutation and 47% had at least two etravirine-associated mutations. In multivariate analysis tenofovir-based regimens were less likely to have at least three nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) mutations after adjusting for subtype, previous ART, CD4, and HIV viral load [P < 0.001, odds ratio (OR) 0.04]. 70% of patients on tenofovir-based regimens had at least two susceptible NRTIs to include in a second-line regimen compared with 40% on zidovudine-based regimens (P = 0.04, OR = 3.4).

conclusionsAt recognition of treatment failure, patients on tenofovir-based first-line regimens had fewer NRTI drug-resistant mutations and more active NRTI drugs available for second-line regimens. These findings can inform strategies for ART regimen sequencing to optimize long-term HIV treatment outcomes in low-resource settings.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, ViralAdenineAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleGenotypeHIV-1HIV SeropositivityHumansMaleMutation, MissenseNigeriaOrganophosphonatesRetrospective StudiesReverse Transcriptase InhibitorsAdenineOrganophosphonatesReverse Transcriptase InhibitorsRNA, ViralTenofovirZidovudine

Identifiers

PMID23079810
PMCPMC6519052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.