ArticleMolecular biology reports2013
Angiotensin-converting enzyme I/D polymorphism and the risk of thoracic aortic dissection in Chinese Han population.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Association of polymorphisms in angiotensin-converting enzyme gene with gestational diabetes mellitus in Indian women.International journal of applied & basic medical researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thoracic aortic dissection (TAD) is a catastrophic cardiovascular disease and is thought to have a genetic basis. Various studies have indicated that renin-angiotensin system plays an important role in the pathogenesis of aortic disease. To determine the association of the I/D polymorphism of ACE gene with the risk of TAD in a Chinese Han population, a hospital-based case-control study was designed consisting of 161 subjects with TAD and 256 control subjects. The genotype frequency of the ACE I/D polymorphism was determined by using a polymerase chain reaction assay. The overall distribution of ACE I/D genotypes was significantly different between the two groups. Compared with the controls, the frequency of DD genotypes and the D allele of ACE gene were significantly increased in TAD patients. Multivariate logistic regression adjusting for conventional vascular risk factors confirmed the association between the ACE I/D polymorphism and the susceptibility to TAD (OR 2.14, 95 % CI 1.38-3.32, P = 0.001). Our data demonstrated that the ACE I/D polymorphism appeared to be an important risk factor in the development of TAD. However, further validation in large population-based studies is needed to confirm the finding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.