Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23079168›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of preventive medicine2012

Social media-delivered sexual health intervention: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Sheana S Bull, Deborah K Levine, Sandra R Black, Sarah J Schmiege, John Santelli

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of preventive medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04206514 (Strengthening Patient-Centered Accessibility, Respect, and Quality of Care for Post Abortion Care Through Peer and Nurse Based Phone Support), which is not on this map. Cited by 169 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
169citing papers in PubMed, 14 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04206514 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Strengthening Patient-Centered Accessibility, Respect, and Quality of Care for Post Abortion Care Through Peer and Nurse Based Phone Support

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2018 to 2018Enrolled371ConditionsReproductive HealthArmsPerson Centered Care - Post Abortion Support
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

169 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Systematic Review of Peer-Reviewed Literature on Global Condom Promotion Programs.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Technology-Based Interventions to Reduce Sexually Transmitted Infections and Unintended Pregnancy Among Youth.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2018
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. The influence of social networking sites on health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2015
    Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

109 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sheana S BullDepartment of Community and Behavioral Health, Colorado School of Public Health, Denver, Colorado, USA. sheana.bull@ucdenver.edu
Deborah K Levine
Sandra R Black
Sarah J Schmiege
John Santelli

Funding

HIV/STD Prevention for Young Adults Online (RMI)R01MH063690 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI BULL, SHEANA S · 2003 to 2006
$1.7M
Online Social Networking for HIV PreventionR01NR010492 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI BULL, SHEANA S · 2007 to 2010
$1.1M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH063690NINR NIH HHS R01 NR010492NINR NIH HHS R01NR010492
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundYouth are using social media regularly and represent a group facing substantial risk for sexually transmitted infection (STI). Although there is evidence that the Internet can be used effectively in supporting healthy sexual behavior, this has not yet extended to social networking sites. PURPOSE: To determine whether STI prevention messages delivered via Facebook are efficacious in preventing increases in sexual risk behavior at 2 and 6 months.

designCluster RCT, October 2010-May 2011. SETTING/

participantsIndividuals (seeds) recruited in multiple settings (online, via newspaper ads and face-to-face) were asked to recruit three friends, who in turn recruited additional friends, extending three waves from the seed. Seeds and waves of friends were considered networks and exposed to either the intervention or control condition.

interventionExposure to Just/Us, a Facebook page developed with youth input, or to control content on 18-24 News, a Facebook page with current events for 2 months.

main outcome measuresCondom use at last sex and proportion of sex acts protected by condoms. Repeated measures of nested data were used to model main effects of exposure to Just/Us and time by treatment interaction.

resultsA total of 1578 participants enrolled, with 14% Latino and 35% African-American; 75% of participants completed at least one study follow-up. Time by treatment effects were observed at 2 months for condom use (intervention 68% vs control 56%, p=0.04) and proportion of sex acts protected by condoms (intervention 63% vs control 57%, p=0.03) where intervention participation reduced the tendency for condom use to decrease over time. No effects were seen at 6 months.

conclusionsSocial networking sites may be venues for efficacious health education interventions. More work is needed to understand what elements of social media are compelling, how network membership influences effects, and whether linking social media to clinical and social services can be beneficial.

trial registrationThis study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.govNCT00725959.

Indexed as

Social MediaAdolescentCluster AnalysisCondomsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth BehaviorHealth EducationHumansMaleRisk-TakingSexual BehaviorSexually Transmitted DiseasesTime FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID23079168
PMCPMC3479665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.