Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23078657›Full record

ArticleStem cells and development2013

An in vitro model of developmental synaptogenesis using cocultures of human neural progenitors and cochlear explants.

Bryony A Nayagam, Albert S Edge, Karina Needham, Tomoko Hyakumura, Jessie Leung, David A X Nayagam, Mirella Dottori

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cells and development, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Reconstruction of Peripheral Auditory Circuit: Recent Advances and Future Challenges.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Organotypic Culture of Neonatal Murine Inner Ear Explants.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Stem-cell therapy for hearing loss: are we there yet?Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bryony A NayagamDepartment of Otolaryngology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Parkville, Australia. b.nayagam@unimelb.edu.au
Albert S Edge
Karina Needham
Tomoko Hyakumura
Jessie Leung
David A X Nayagam
Mirella Dottori

Funding

Cellular therapy for the inner earR01DC007174 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI EDGE, ALBERT · 2005 to 2017
$4.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC007174
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In mammals, the sensory hair cells and auditory neurons do not spontaneously regenerate and their loss results in permanent hearing impairment. Stem cell therapy is one emerging strategy that is being investigated to overcome the loss of sensory cells after hearing loss. To successfully replace auditory neurons, stem cell-derived neurons must be electrically active, capable of organized outgrowth of processes, and of making functional connections with appropriate tissues. We have developed an in vitro assay to test these parameters using cocultures of developing cochlear explants together with neural progenitors derived from human embryonic stem cells (hESCs). We found that these neural progenitors are electrically active and extend their neurites toward the sensory hair cells in cochlear explants. Importantly, this neurite extension was found to be significantly greater when neural progenitors were predifferentiated toward a neural crest-like lineage. When grown in coculture with hair cells only (denervated cochlear explants), stem cell-derived processes were capable of locating and growing along the hair cell rows in an en passant-like manner. Many presynaptic terminals (synapsin 1-positive) were observed between hair cells and stem cell-derived processes in vitro. These results suggest that differentiated hESC-derived neural progenitors may be useful for developing therapies directed at auditory nerve replacement, including complementing emerging hair cell regeneration therapies.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsCells, CulturedCochleaCoculture TechniquesEpitheliumHumansIntermediate Filament ProteinsMembrane GlycoproteinsMiceModels, BiologicalNerve Tissue ProteinsNeural CrestNeural Stem CellsNeurogenesisPAX2 Transcription FactorIntermediate Filament ProteinsMembrane GlycoproteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsPAX2 protein, humanPAX2 Transcription FactorPeripherinsPOU4F1 protein, humanTranscription Factor Brn-3A

Identifiers

PMID23078657
PMCPMC3698684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.