Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23078492›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of public health2012

Evaluation of an education, restraint distribution, and fitting program to promote correct use of age-appropriate child restraints for children aged 3 to 5 years: a cluster randomized trial.

Lisa Keay, Kate Hunter, Julie Brown, Judy M Simpson, Lynne E Bilston, Maureen Elliott, Mark Stevenson, Rebecca Q Ivers

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of public health, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Changes in child restraint practices in Shenzhen, China three years after the enactment of local legislation: two population-based cross-sectional surveys.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Prevention of severe injuries of child passengers in motor vehicle accidents: is re-boarding sufficient?European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Affordability and Availability of Child Restraints in an Under-Served Population in South Africa.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lisa KeayThe George Institute for Global Health and the Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. lkeay@georgeinstitute.org.au
Kate Hunter
Julie Brown
Judy M Simpson
Lynne E Bilston
Maureen Elliott
Mark Stevenson
Rebecca Q Ivers
The George Institute for Global Health · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe evaluated an education, distribution, and fitting program for increasing age-appropriate and correct child restraint use.

methodsWe performed a cluster randomized trial involving 28 early childhood education centers in low socioeconomic status areas in Sydney, Australia. The main outcome was optimal restraint use defined as age-appropriate restraints, installed into the vehicle correctly and used correctly.

resultsOne service withdrew after randomization, so data are presented for 689 child passengers, aged 3 to 5 years, from 27 centers. More children attending intervention centers were optimally restrained (43% vs 31%; P = .01; allowing for clustering). More 3-year-olds were using forward-facing seats rather than booster seats, more 4- to 5-year-olds were using booster seats instead of seat belts alone, and there were fewer errors in use at intervention centers. Among non-English-speaking families, more children attending intervention centers were optimally restrained (43% vs 17%; P = .002; allowing for clustering).

conclusionsThe program increased use of age-appropriate restraints and correct use of restraints, which translates to improved crash injury protection. Multifaceted education, seat distribution, and fitting enhanced legislation effects, and the effect size was larger in non-English-speaking families.

Indexed as

Child Restraint SystemsAccidents, TrafficAge FactorsChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleProgram EvaluationSocioeconomic FactorsVictoria

Identifiers

PMID23078492
PMCPMC3519299
OpenAlexW2161779848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.