Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23077253›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2012

The T-cell receptor is not hardwired to engage MHC ligands.

Stephen J Holland, Istvan Bartok, Meriem Attaf, Raphael Genolet, Immanuel F Luescher, Eleni Kotsiou, Ashkenaz Richard, Edward Wang, Matthew White, David J Coe and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. MHC Restriction: Where Are We Now?Viral immunology · 2020
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Restricting nonclassical MHC genes coevolve with TRAV genes used by innate-like T cells in mammals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  11. Revealing the TCR bias for MHC molecules.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  12. How structural adaptability exists alongside HLA-A2 bias in the human αβ TCR repertoire.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. T cell receptor bias for MHC: co-evolution or co-receptors?Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2014
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Stephen J HollandMolecular Immunology Section, Division of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom. holland@ie-freiburg.mpg.de
Istvan Bartok
Meriem Attaf
Raphael Genolet
Immanuel F Luescher
Eleni Kotsiou
Ashkenaz Richard
Edward Wang
Matthew White
David J Coe
Jian-Guo Chai
Cristina Ferreira
Julian Dyson
Hammersmith Hospital · GBImperial College London · GBLudwig Cancer Research · CHLudwig Cancer Research · BEMax Planck Institute of Immunobiology and Epigenetics · DE

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F020732/1Medical Research CouncilWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The bias of αβ T cells for MHC ligands has been proposed to be intrinsic to the T-cell receptor (TCR). Equally, the CD4 and CD8 coreceptors contribute to ligand restriction by colocalizing Lck with the TCR when MHC ligands are engaged. To determine the importance of intrinsic ligand bias, the germ-line TCR complementarity determining regions were extensively diversified in vivo. We show that engagement with MHC ligands during thymocyte selection and peripheral T-cell activation imposes remarkably little constraint over TCR structure. Such versatility is more consistent with an opportunist, rather than a predetermined, mode of interface formation. This hypothesis was experimentally confirmed by expressing a hybrid TCR containing TCR-γ chain germ-line complementarity determining regions, which engaged efficiently with MHC ligands.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsBase SequenceCell LineageComplementarity Determining RegionsGerm CellsLigandsMajor Histocompatibility ComplexMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMolecular Sequence DataMutationReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, alpha-betaReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, gamma-deltaRecombination, GeneticSelection, GeneticComplementarity Determining RegionsLigandsReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, alpha-betaReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, gamma-delta

Identifiers

PMID23077253
PMCPMC3494948
OpenAlexW2023323249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.