SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2012
Antibiotics for clinically diagnosed acute rhinosinusitis in adults.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03431337 (Treatment of Acute Sinusitis With High-Dose vs. Standard-Dose Amoxicillin/Clavulanate), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Treatment of Acute Sinusitis With High-Dose vs. Standard-Dose Amoxicillin/Clavulanate: A Confirmation Study
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.
- Procalcitonin as a Biomarker in Rhinosinusitis: A Systematic Review.American journal of rhinology & allergy · 2019Pooled it
- Antibiotics for acute rhinosinusitis in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Guideline
- Diagnosis of acute rhinosinusitis in primary care: a systematic review of test accuracy.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2016Pooled it
- Antibiotic efficacy in patients with a moderate probability of acute rhinosinusitis: a systematic review.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2016Pooled it
- Antibiotics for acute laryngitis in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Pelargonium sidoides extract for treating acute respiratory tract infections.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- High-Dose vs Standard-Dose Amoxicillin Plus Clavulanate for Adults With Acute Sinusitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2021Trial
- High-dose versus standard-dose amoxicillin/clavulanate for clinically-diagnosed acute bacterial sinusitis: A randomized clinical trial.PloS one · 2018Trial
- Trial
- Comparative Outcomes of Amoxicillin and Amoxicillin-Clavulanate in the Treatment of Acute Rhinosinusitis in Adults with Comorbidities: A Retrospective Study.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Personalized Management of Chronic Rhinosinusitis in the Context of Immune Deficiency.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
- Article
- Moving from a pilot study to large pragmatic trial in primary care settings: A study on acute rhinosinusitis.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Optimising antibiotic exposure by customising the duration of treatment for respiratory tract infections based on patient needs in primary care.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Review
- Is there a role for antibiotics in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis?The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2022Review
- Survey of potentially inappropriate prescriptions for common cold symptoms in Japan: A cross-sectional study.PloS one · 2022Article
- Debunking Myths: Sinus Headache.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2021Review
- Evidence-based medicine, shared decision making and the hidden curriculum: a qualitative content analysis.Perspectives on medical education · 2020Article
- Is sharing the TARGET respiratory tract infection leaflet feasible in routine general practice to improve patient education and appropriate antibiotic use? A mixed methods study in England with patients and healthcare professionals.Journal of infection prevention · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn primary care settings, the diagnosis of rhinosinusitis is generally based on clinical signs and symptoms. Technical investigations are not routinely performed, nor recommended. Individual trials show a trend in favour of antibiotics, but the balance of benefit versus harm is unclear.
objectivesTo assess the effect of antibiotics in adults with clinically diagnosed rhinosinusitis in primary care settings. SEARCH
methodsWe searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2012), MEDLINE (January 1950 to February week 4, 2012) and EMBASE (January 1974 to February 2012). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of antibiotics versus placebo in participants with rhinosinusitis-like signs or symptoms. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. We contacted trial authors for additional information. We collected information on adverse effects from the trials. MAIN
resultsWe included 10 trials involving 2450 participants. Overall, the risk of bias in these studies was low. Irrespective of the treatment group, 47% of participants were cured after one week and 71% after 14 days. Antibiotics can shorten the time to cure, but only five more participants per 100 will cure faster at any time point between 7 and 14 days if they receive antibiotics instead of placebo (number needed to treat to benefit (NNTB)) 18 (95% confidence interval (CI) 10 to 115, I(2) statistic 0%, eight trials). Purulent secretion resolves faster with antibiotics (odds ratio (OR) 1.58 (95% CI 1.13 to 2.22)), (NNTB 11, 95% CI 6 to 51, I(2) statistic 0%, three trials). However, 27% of the participants who received antibiotics and 15% of those who received placebo experienced adverse events (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.60 to 2.77) (number needed to treat to harm (NNTH)) 8 (95% CI 6 to 13, I(2) statistic 13%, seven trials). More participants in the placebo group needed to start antibiotic therapy because of an abnormal course of rhinosinusitis (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.66), NNTH 20 (95% CI 14 to 35, I(2) statistic 0%, eight trials). Only one disease-related complication (brain abscess) occurred in a patient treated with antibiotics. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThe potential benefit of antibiotics in the treatment of clinically diagnosed acute rhinosinusitis needs to be seen in the context of a high prevalence of adverse events. Taking into account antibiotic resistance and the very low incidence of serious complications, we conclude that there is no place for antibiotics for the patient with clinically diagnosed, uncomplicated acute rhinosinusitis. This review cannot make recommendations for children, patients with a suppressed immune system and patients with severe disease, as these populations were not included in the available trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.