Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23076918›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2012

Antibiotics for clinically diagnosed acute rhinosinusitis in adults.

Marieke B Lemiengre, Mieke L van Driel, Dan Merenstein, James Young, An I M De Sutter

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03431337 (Treatment of Acute Sinusitis With High-Dose vs. Standard-Dose Amoxicillin/Clavulanate), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03431337 phase4terminatednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Treatment of Acute Sinusitis With High-Dose vs. Standard-Dose Amoxicillin/Clavulanate: A Confirmation Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorPaul Sorum, MDRan2018 to 2020Enrolled157ConditionsSinusitis, AcuteArmsAmoxicillin 875 mg, Placebo (lactase)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Procalcitonin as a Biomarker in Rhinosinusitis: A Systematic Review.American journal of rhinology & allergy · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Antibiotics for acute rhinosinusitis in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Diagnosis of acute rhinosinusitis in primary care: a systematic review of test accuracy.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2016
    Pooled it
  5. Antibiotic efficacy in patients with a moderate probability of acute rhinosinusitis: a systematic review.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2016
    Pooled it
  6. Antibiotics for acute laryngitis in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Is there a role for antibiotics in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis?The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Debunking Myths: Sinus Headache.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Marieke B LemiengreDepartment of General Practice and Primary Health Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. marieke.lemiengre@ugent.be.
Mieke L van Driel
Dan Merenstein
James Young
An I M De Sutter
Ghent University · BEBond University · AUGeorgetown University Medical Center · USUniversity Hospital of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn primary care settings, the diagnosis of rhinosinusitis is generally based on clinical signs and symptoms. Technical investigations are not routinely performed, nor recommended. Individual trials show a trend in favour of antibiotics, but the balance of benefit versus harm is unclear.

objectivesTo assess the effect of antibiotics in adults with clinically diagnosed rhinosinusitis in primary care settings. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2012), MEDLINE (January 1950 to February week 4, 2012) and EMBASE (January 1974 to February 2012). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of antibiotics versus placebo in participants with rhinosinusitis-like signs or symptoms. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. We contacted trial authors for additional information. We collected information on adverse effects from the trials. MAIN

resultsWe included 10 trials involving 2450 participants. Overall, the risk of bias in these studies was low. Irrespective of the treatment group, 47% of participants were cured after one week and 71% after 14 days. Antibiotics can shorten the time to cure, but only five more participants per 100 will cure faster at any time point between 7 and 14 days if they receive antibiotics instead of placebo (number needed to treat to benefit (NNTB)) 18 (95% confidence interval (CI) 10 to 115, I(2) statistic 0%, eight trials). Purulent secretion resolves faster with antibiotics (odds ratio (OR) 1.58 (95% CI 1.13 to 2.22)), (NNTB 11, 95% CI 6 to 51, I(2) statistic 0%, three trials). However, 27% of the participants who received antibiotics and 15% of those who received placebo experienced adverse events (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.60 to 2.77) (number needed to treat to harm (NNTH)) 8 (95% CI 6 to 13, I(2) statistic 13%, seven trials). More participants in the placebo group needed to start antibiotic therapy because of an abnormal course of rhinosinusitis (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.66), NNTH 20 (95% CI 14 to 35, I(2) statistic 0%, eight trials). Only one disease-related complication (brain abscess) occurred in a patient treated with antibiotics. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThe potential benefit of antibiotics in the treatment of clinically diagnosed acute rhinosinusitis needs to be seen in the context of a high prevalence of adverse events. Taking into account antibiotic resistance and the very low incidence of serious complications, we conclude that there is no place for antibiotics for the patient with clinically diagnosed, uncomplicated acute rhinosinusitis. This review cannot make recommendations for children, patients with a suppressed immune system and patients with severe disease, as these populations were not included in the available trials.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRhinitisSinusitisTime FactorsAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID23076918
OpenAlexW2144421383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.