SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2012
Drugs for preventing lung cancer in healthy people.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Drugs for preventing lung cancer in healthy people.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Selenium for preventing cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Sex based subgroup differences in randomized controlled trials: empirical evidence from Cochrane meta-analyses.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2016Pooled it
- Survivorship: nutrition and weight management, Version 2.2014. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2014Guideline
- Chemotherapy versus best supportive care for extensive small cell lung cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Carotenoids in Mood Disorders: An Overview.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Table olives and health: a review.Journal of nutritional science · 2020Review
- Review
- Vitamin C Transporters in Cancer: Current Understanding and Gaps in Knowledge.Frontiers in oncology · 2017Review
- Chemoprevention in gastrointestinal physiology and disease. Targeting the progression of cancer with natural products: a focus on gastrointestinal cancer.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2016Review
- Raw Garlic Consumption and Lung Cancer in a Chinese Population.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2016Article
- Oxidative stress, anti-oxidants and the cross-sectional and longitudinal association with depressive symptoms: results from the CARDIA study.Translational psychiatry · 2016Article
- Pharmacological Modulation of Lung Carcinogenesis in Smokers: Preclinical and Clinical Evidence.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2016Review
- Antioxidant Intake and Antitumor Therapy: Toward Nutritional Recommendations for Optimal Results.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2016Review
- Chemoprevention of cancer: current evidence and future prospects.F1000Research · 2015Review
- Loss of miR125a expression in a model of K-ras-dependent pulmonary premalignancy.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2014Article
- Addressing nutritional gaps with multivitamin and mineral supplements.Nutrition journal · 2014Review
- Fast food fever: reviewing the impacts of the Western diet on immunity.Nutrition journal · 2014Review
- The thresholds for statistical and clinical significance - a five-step procedure for evaluation of intervention effects in randomised clinical trials.BMC medical research methodology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis is an updated version of the original review published in Issue 2, 2003. Some studies have suggested a protective effect of antioxidant nutrients on lung cancer. Observational epidemiological studies suggest an association between higher dietary levels of fruits and vegetables containing beta-carotene and a lower risk of lung cancer.
objectivesTo determine whether vitamins, minerals and other potential agents, alone or in combination, reduce incidence and mortality from lung cancer in healthy people. SEARCH
methodsFor this update we have used a search strategy adapted from the design in the original review. The following electronic databases have been searched up to December 2011: MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). References included in published studies and reviews were also screened. SELECTION CRITERIA: Included studies were randomised controlled clinical trials comparing different vitamins, mineral supplements or supplements with placebo, administered to healthy people with the aim of preventing lung cancer. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently selected the trials to be included in the review, assessed the methodological quality of each trial and extracted data using a standardised form. For each study, relative risk and 95% confidence limits were calculated for dichotomous outcomes and pooled results were calculated using the random-effect model. MAIN
resultsIn the first version of this review four studies were included; in this review update, an additional five studies have been included. Four studies included only males and two only females; two studies included only participants considered at high risk, namely smokers or exposed to asbestos, and one study included people deficient in many micronutrients. Six studies analysed vitamin A, three vitamin C, four vitamin E, one selenium supplements, and six studied combinations of two or more products. All the RCTs included in this review were classified as being of low risk of bias.For people not at high risk of lung cancer and compared to placebo, none of the supplements of vitamins or minerals or their combinations resulted in a statistically significant difference in lung cancer incidence or mortality, except for a single study that included 7627 women and found a higher risk of lung cancer incidence for those taking vitamin C but not for total cancer incidence, but that effect was not seen in males or when the results for males and females were pooled.For people at high risk of lung cancer, such as smokers and those exposed to asbestos and compared to placebo, beta-carotene intake showed a small but statistically significant higher risk of lung cancer incidence, lung cancer mortality and for all-causes mortality. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThere is no evidence for recommending supplements of vitamins A, C, E, selenium, either alone or in different combinations, for the prevention of lung cancer and lung cancer mortality in healthy people. There is some evidence that the use of beta-carotene supplements could be associated with a small increase in lung cancer incidence and mortality in smokers or persons exposed to asbestos.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.