SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2012
External cephalic version for breech presentation at term.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.
- Expedited versus conservative approaches for vaginal delivery in breech presentation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- External cephalic version for breech presentation at term.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Interventions for helping to turn term breech babies to head first presentation when using external cephalic version.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Trial
- Talcum powder or aqueous gel to aid external cephalic version: a randomised controlled trial.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2014Trial
- Retrospective Analysis of Pregnancy Outcomes Following External Cephalic Version for Breech Presentation.International journal of women's health · 2023Article
- Flat trend of high caesarean section rates in Peru: A pooled analysis of 3,376,062 births from the national birth registry, 2012 to 2020.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2022Article
- Development of prediction models for successful external cephalic version and delivery outcome.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2022Article
- The impact of a routine late third trimester growth scan on the incidence, diagnosis, and management of breech presentation in Oxfordshire, UK: A cohort study.PLoS medicine · 2021Article
- Effects of external cephalic version for breech presentation at or near term in high-resource settings: A systematic review of randomized and non-randomized studies.European journal of midwifery · 2020Review
- External Cephalic Version: A Dying Art Worth Reviving.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2018Article
- Robson 10-groups classification system to access C-section in two public hospitals of the Federal District/Brazil.PloS one · 2018Article
- External cephalic version experiences in Korea.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2016Article
- Management of breech presentation at term: a retrospective cohort study of 10 years of experience.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2015Article
- Interventions to Improve Neonatal Health and Later Survival: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.EBioMedicine · 2015Review
- Neuraxial blockade for external cephalic version: Cost analysis.The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2015Article
- Essential interventions: implementation strategies and proposed packages of care.Reproductive health · 2014Article
- Essential pre-pregnancy and pregnancy interventions for improved maternal, newborn and child health.Reproductive health · 2014Review
- Development of quality of care indicators from systematic reviews: the case of hospital delivery.Implementation science : IS · 2013Article
- A qualitative interview study exploring pregnant women's and health professionals' attitudes to external cephalic version.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundManagement of breech presentation is controversial, particularly in regard to manipulation of the position of the fetus by external cephalic version (ECV). ECV may reduce the number of breech presentations and caesarean sections, but there also have been reports of complications with the procedure.
objectivesThe objective of this review was to assess the effects of ECV at or near term on measures of pregnancy outcome. Methods of facilitating ECV, and ECV before term are reviewed separately. SEARCH
methodsWe searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Trials Register (7 August 2012). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials of ECV at or near term (with or without tocolysis) compared with no attempt at ECV in women with breech presentation. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors assessed eligibility and trial quality, and extracted the data. MAIN
resultsWe included seven studies. The pooled data from these studies show a statistically significant and clinically meaningful reduction in non-cephalic birth (seven trials, 1245 women; risk ratio (RR) 0.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31 to 0.66; and caesarean section (seven trials, 1245 women; RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.90) when ECV was attempted. There were no significant differences in the incidence of Apgar score ratings below seven at one minute (two trials, 108 women; RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.89) or five minutes (four trials, 368 women; RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.32 to 1.77), low umbilical artery pH levels (one trial, 52 women; RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.17 to 2.44), neonatal admission (one trial, 52 women; RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.04 to 3.24), perinatal death (six trials, 1053 women; RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.05 to 2.12), nor time from enrolment to delivery (2 trials, 256 women; weighted mean difference -0.25 days, 95% CI -2.81 to 2.31). AUTHORS'
conclusionsAttempting cephalic version at term reduces the chance of non-cephalic births and caesarean section. There is not enough evidence from randomised trials to assess complications of external cephalic version at term. Large observational studies suggest that complications are rare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.