Trial reportInternational urogynecology journal2013
The vaginally assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a pilot study.
Trial report in International urogynecology journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biopsychosocial profile of women with pelvic organ prolapse: A systematic review.Women's health (London, England)Pooled it
- Medium- to long-term outcomes of vaginally assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of stage III-IV pelvic organ prolapse.BMC women's health · 2022Article
- Review
- Severe pelvic organ prolapse. Is there a long-term cure?International urogynecology journal · 2019Article
- Cuff Closure by Vaginal Route in TLH: Case Series and Review of Literature.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2017Article
- Surgical Outcomes of a Combined Surgical Approach for Apical Prolapse Repair.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2016Article
- Vaginal hysterectomy for uterovaginal prolapse: what is the incidence of concurrent gynecological malignancy?International urogynecology journal · 2015Article
- Vaginally assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of complete uterovaginal prolapse.International urogynecology journal · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisWe assessed the efficacy and safety of an operative technique, the vaginally assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (VALS), for the treatment of women with severe uterovaginal prolapse (UVP).
methodsA prospective pilot study of women with severe UVP, who underwent VALS, was carried out. Preoperatively, POP was assessed using the International Continence Society Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (ICS POP-Q) system and symptoms were evaluated using the International Consultation on Incontinence Modular Questionnaire-Vaginal Symptoms (ICIQ-VS). VALS is a combined minimally invasive surgical approach where a vaginal hysterectomy is initially performed, followed by a transvaginal placement of a synthetic mesh which is suspended laparoscopically on the sacral promontory. Postoperative assessment at 12 months was identical to the preoperative assessment with the addition of the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) for urogenital prolapse. Perioperative and postoperative complications were recorded.
resultsTwenty-seven women with a mean age of 57.2 (range, 47-73) were included. Twenty women (74.1%) had stage 3 and 7 (25.9%) had stage 4 POP with a median point C = +5 (range, +2 to +8). VALS was successfully performed in all patients. All patients completed their follow-up assessment at 12 months. All POP-Q points showed statistically significant improvement apart from TVL, which remained unchanged. ICIQ-VS scores showed a statistically significant improvement of the vaginal symptoms and the total quality of life. The sexual matters score showed a tendency towards improvement, although it did not reach statistical significance.
conclusionsVaginally assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy appears to be a valid and safe minimally invasive option when treating women presenting with severe UVP, with encouraging short-term anatomical and functional outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.