ArticleInternational ophthalmology2013
Choroidal neovascularization following laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia: a case series.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of neuroprotective citicoline eye drops on macular microcirculation.International ophthalmology · 2020Article
- Choroidal neovascularization following photorefractive keratectomy.Journal of current ophthalmology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To report three patients who developed unilateral choroidal neovascularization (CNV) following laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for high myopia. Retrospective chart reviews of three highly myopic patients who developed CNV following LASIK and who attended a tertiary care private practice were conducted. The clinical presentation of the patients was analyzed. All patients were treated with a combination of intravitreal ranibizumab and photodynamic therapy with verteporfin. Main outcome measures were clinical fundus appearance and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) after treatment. Two females and one male with a mean age of 34 ± 2.8 years underwent LASIK for high myopia in both eyes. The mean spherical equivalent was -11.42 diopters (D) (range -6.75 to -20.00). The mean time interval between LASIK and the appearance of symptoms was 9.3 ± 8.5 weeks. One patient developed an extrafoveal CNV at the edge of a laser photocoagulation scar, one developed a subfoveal CNV and the third patient developed a juxtafoveal CNV. The mean BCVA at the time of CNV presentation was 0.44 logMAR (range 0.10-0.70 logMAR). Following treatment, the mean BCVA improved to 0.17 logMAR with complete resolution of CNV in two patients. CNV is a rare but potentially blinding complication following LASIK. Short-term good visual outcome can be achieved with timely intervention with current treatment modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.