Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23076293›Full record

Trial reportJournal of bone and mineral metabolism2013

A comparative study of the effects of daily minodronate and weekly alendronate on upper gastrointestinal symptoms, bone resorption, and back pain in postmenopausal osteoporosis patients.

Toru Yoshioka, Nobukazu Okimoto, Ken Okamoto, Akinori Sakai

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of bone and mineral metabolism, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05645289 (Efficacy and Safety of Minodronate in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis With Low Back Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05645289 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy and Safety of Minodronate in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis With Low Back Pain: a Single-centre and Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeking University Third HospitalRan2023 to 2024Enrolled72ConditionsPostmenopausal OsteoporosisArmsMinodronate, Alendronate
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Minodronate for the treatment of osteoporosis.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Clinical efficacy and treatment persistence of monthly minodronate for osteoporotic patients unsatisfied with, and shifted from, daily or weekly bisphosphonates: the BP-MUSASHI study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2014
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Toru YoshiokaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Sakamidorii Hospital, 6-28-1 Midorii, Asaminami-ku, Hiroshima, Hiroshima, 731-0103, Japan. t-yossy@rc4.so-net.ne.jp
Nobukazu Okimoto
Ken Okamoto
Akinori Sakai
Akebono Clinic · JPHiroshima Kyoritsu Hospital · JPUniversity of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to precisely compare both the efficacy and abdominal symptom-related quality of life after treatment with daily minodronate and weekly alendronate in patients with primary postmenopausal osteoporosis. The efficacy of the two drugs was assessed based on improvements in a bone turnover marker, back pain, and gastrointestinal symptoms that impair quality of life, which was assessed using the Izumo scale questionnaire. In the minodronate group, there were no significant changes during the treatment period in the specific scores for heartburn, epigastralgia and epigastric fullness, whereas all of the scores were significantly elevated at some time point after drug administration in the alendronate group. Urinary N-telopeptide of type I collagen (uNTX), a bone resorption marker, and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, a bone formation marker, significantly decreased in both groups, but decreases in uNTX in the minodronate group was observed significantly earlier compared with those in the alendronate group. The back pain scores, which were obtained using a visual analog scale, were significantly reduced in both groups. However, analgesic effects were detected earlier in the minodronate group. In conclusion, compared with weekly alendronate, daily minodronate improved bone turnover and back pain more promptly without causing upper gastrointestinal symptoms.

Indexed as

AgedAlendronateBack PainBiomarkersBone DensityBone Density Conservation AgentsBone RemodelingBone ResorptionCollagen Type IDiphosphonatesDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleGastrointestinal TractHumansImidazolesOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalAlendronateBiomarkersBone Density Conservation AgentsCollagen Type Icollagen type I trimeric cross-linked peptideDiphosphonatesImidazolesPeptidesYM 529

Identifiers

PMID23076293
OpenAlexW2011110954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.