Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23076151›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2012

SHOC2 and CRAF mediate ERK1/2 reactivation in mutant NRAS-mediated resistance to RAF inhibitor.

Fred M Kaplan, Curtis H Kugel, Neda Dadpey, Yongping Shao, Ethan V Abel, Andrew E Aplin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Tumor Cell Resistance to the Inhibition of BRAF and MEK1/2.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. A Review of the Molecular Pathways Involved in Resistance to BRAF Inhibitors in Patients with Advanced-Stage Melanoma.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fred M KaplanDepartment of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, USA.
Curtis H Kugel
Neda Dadpey
Yongping Shao
Ethan V Abel
Andrew E Aplin
Thomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

X-Ray Crystallography and Macromolecular CharacterizationP30CA056036 · NCI · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI DANIEL P SILVER · 1995 to 2026
$94.8M
Adhesion Regulation of ERK Trafficking to the NucleusR01GM067893 · NIGMS · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI APLIN, ANDREW ERIC · 2004 to 2013
$2.7M
B-RAF Regulation of the Cell Cycle in MelanomaR01CA125103 · NCI · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI APLIN, ANDREW ERIC · 2008 to 2013
$1.4M
Pancreatic Cancer Prevention with NO-releasing NSAIDsR01CA101019 · NCI · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI RIGAS, BASIL · 2004 to 2008
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS CA101019NCI NIH HHS CA125103NCI NIH HHS P30 CA056036NCI NIH HHS R01 CA101019NCI NIH HHS R01 CA125103NIGMS NIH HHS GM067893NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM067893
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ERK1/2 signaling is frequently dysregulated in tumors through BRAF mutation. Targeting mutant BRAF with vemurafenib frequently elicits therapeutic responses; however, durable effects are often limited by ERK1/2 pathway reactivation via poorly defined mechanisms. We generated mutant BRAF(V600E) melanoma cells that exhibit resistance to PLX4720, the tool compound for vemurafenib, that co-expressed mutant (Q61K) NRAS. In these BRAF(V600E)/NRAS(Q61K) co-expressing cells, re-activation of the ERK1/2 pathway during PLX4720 treatment was dependent on NRAS. Expression of mutant NRAS in parental BRAF(V600) cells was sufficient to by-pass PLX4720 effects on ERK1/2 signaling, entry into S phase and susceptibility to apoptosis in a manner dependent on the RAF binding site in NRAS. ERK1/2 activation in BRAF(V600E)/NRAS(Q61K) cells required CRAF only in the presence of PLX4720, indicating a switch in RAF isoform requirement. Both ERK1/2 activation and resistance to apoptosis of BRAF(V600E)/NRAS(Q61K) cells in the presence of PLX4720 was modulated by SHOC-2/Sur-8 expression, a RAS-RAF scaffold protein. These data show that NRAS mutations confer resistance to RAF inhibitors in mutant BRAF cells and alter RAF isoform and scaffold molecule requirements to re-activate the ERK1/2 pathway.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SubstitutionCell Line, TumorDrug Resistance, NeoplasmEnzyme ActivationHumansIndolesIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMAP Kinase Signaling SystemMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 1Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 3Mutation, MissenseProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins c-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)S PhaseSulfonamidesBRAF protein, humanIndolesIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMAPK1 protein, humanMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 1Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 3PLX 4720Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins c-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)SHOC2 protein, humanSulfonamides

Identifiers

PMID23076151
PMCPMC3516728
OpenAlexW1972458361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.