Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23075840›Full record

SynthesisProceedings. Biological sciences2012

The probability of genetic parallelism and convergence in natural populations.

Gina L Conte, Matthew E Arnegard, Catherine L Peichel, Dolph Schluter

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 188 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
188citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

188 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Adaptive molecular convergence is pervasive across deep time and largely decoupled from phenotypic convergence.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

128 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gina L ConteBiodiversity Research Centre and Zoology Department, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. conte@zoology.ubc.ca
Matthew E Arnegard
Catherine L Peichel
Dolph Schluter

Funding

The Genetics of Parallel Reproductive Isolation in Stickleback Species PairsR01GM089733 · NIGMS · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI PEICHEL, CATHERINE L. · 2010 to 2012
$1.4M
The Genetics of Behavioral Reproductive Isolation in Threespine SticklebacksF32GM086125 · NIGMS · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI ARNEGARD, MATTHEW E · 2008 to 2009
$105k
NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM086125NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM089733
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic and genetic methods allow investigation of how frequently the same genes are used by different populations during adaptive evolution, yielding insights into the predictability of evolution at the genetic level. We estimated the probability of gene reuse in parallel and convergent phenotypic evolution in nature using data from published studies. The estimates are surprisingly high, with mean probabilities of 0.32 for genetic mapping studies and 0.55 for candidate gene studies. The probability declines with increasing age of the common ancestor of compared taxa, from about 0.8 for young nodes to 0.1-0.4 for the oldest nodes in our study. Probability of gene reuse is higher when populations begin from the same ancestor (genetic parallelism) than when they begin from divergent ancestors (genetic convergence). Our estimates are broadly consistent with genomic estimates of gene reuse during repeated adaptation to similar environments, but most genomic studies lack data on phenotypic traits affected. Frequent reuse of the same genes during repeated phenotypic evolution suggests that strong biases and constraints affect adaptive evolution, resulting in changes at a relatively small subset of available genes. Declines in the probability of gene reuse with increasing age suggest that these biases diverge with time.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGenetic VariationPhylogenySelection, GeneticAdaptation, BiologicalEnvironmentGenomePhenotypeProbability

Identifiers

PMID23075840
PMCPMC3497250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.