Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23075701›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2012

Oral sapacitabine for the treatment of acute myeloid leukaemia in elderly patients: a randomised phase 2 study.

Hagop Kantarjian, Stefan Faderl, Guillermo Garcia-Manero, Selina Luger, Parameswaran Venugopal, Lori Maness, Meir Wetzler, Steven Coutre, Wendy Stock, David Claxton and 8 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00590187 (A Randomized Phase 2 Study of Oral Sapacitabine in Elderly Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Previously Untreated or in First Relapse, or Previously Treated Myelodysplastic Syndromes), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00590187 phase2completednot on this map

A Randomized Phase 2 Study of Oral Sapacitabine in Elderly Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Previously Untreated or in First Relapse, or Previously Treated Myelodysplastic Syndromes

TypeinterventionalSponsorCyclacel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Ran2007 to 2018Enrolled105ConditionsAcute Myeloid LeukemiaArmsSapacitabine, Arm A, Sapacitabine, Arm B, Sapacitabine, Arm C, Sapacitabine, Arm D, sapacitabine, Arm E
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Targeting DNA Repair Pathways in Hematological Malignancies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Clinical update on hypomethylating agents.International journal of hematology · 2019
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Precision therapy for acute myeloid leukemia.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2018
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Treatment of Elderly Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Current treatment options in oncology · 2017
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Hagop KantarjianThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. hkantarj@mdanderson.org
Stefan Faderl
Guillermo Garcia-Manero
Selina Luger
Parameswaran Venugopal
Lori Maness
Meir Wetzler
Steven Coutre
Wendy Stock
David Claxton
Stuart L Goldberg
Martha Arellano
Stephen A Strickland
Karen Seiter
Gary Schiller
Elias Jabbour
Judy Chiao
William Plunkett

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer SPORE-LeukemiaP50CA100632 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI KONOPLEVA, MARINA Y · 2003 to 2023
$43.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P50 CA100632
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAvailable treatments for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) have limited durable activity and unsatisfactory safety profiles in most elderly patients. We assessed the efficacy and toxicity of sapacitabine, a novel oral cytosine nucleoside analogue, in elderly patients with AML.

methodsIn this randomised, phase 2 study, we recruited patients with AML who were either treatment naive or at first relapse and who were aged 70 years or older from 12 centres in the USA. We used a computer-generated randomisation sequence to randomly allocate eligible patients to receive one of three schedules of oral sapacitabine (1:1:1; stratified by a history of AML treatment): 200 mg twice a day for 7 days (group A); 300 mg twice a day for 7 days (group B); and 400 mg twice a day for 3 days each week for 2 weeks (group C). All schedules were given in 28 day cycles. To confirm the safety and tolerability of dosing schedules, after 20 patients had been treated in a group we enrolled an expanded cohort of 20-25 patients to that group if at least four patients had achieved complete remission or complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery, and if the 30 day death rate was 20% or less. Our primary endpoint was 1-year overall survival, analysed by intention-to-treat (ie, patients who have received at least one dose of sapacitabine) in those patients who had been randomly allocated to treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00590187.

resultsBetween Dec 27, 2007, and April 21, 2009, we enrolled 105 patients: 86 patients were previously untreated and 19 were at first relapse. Of the 60 patients randomly allocated to treatment, 1-year overall survival was 35% (95% CI 16-59) in group A, 10% (2-33) in group B, and 30% (13-54) in group C. 14 (13%) of 105 patients died within 30 days and 27 (26%) died within 60 days. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were anaemia (eight of 40 patients in group A, 12 of 20 patients in group B, and 15 of 45 patients in group C), neutropenia (14 in group A, 10 in group B, 11 in group C), thrombocytopenia (24 in group A, 12 in group B, and 22 in group C), febrile neutropenia (16 in group A, nine in group B, and 22 in group C), and pneumonia (seven in group A, five in group B, and 10 in group C). The most common grade 5 events were pneumonia (two in group A, one in group B, and three in group C) and sepsis (six in group A, three in group B, and one in group C). Seven deaths were thought to be probably or possibly related to sapacitabine treatment.

interpretationSapacitabine seems active and tolerable in elderly patients with AML. The 400 mg dose schedule had the best efficacy profile. Future investigations should aim to combine sapacitabine with other low-intensity therapies in elderly patients with AML.

fundingCyclacel Limited.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAgedAged, 80 and overAnemiaArabinonucleosidesCytosineDisease-Free SurvivalDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleNeutropeniaPneumoniaThrombocytopeniaArabinonucleosidesCytosinesapacitabine

Identifiers

PMID23075701
PMCPMC4004358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.