Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2012
Oral sapacitabine for the treatment of acute myeloid leukaemia in elderly patients: a randomised phase 2 study.
Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00590187 (A Randomized Phase 2 Study of Oral Sapacitabine in Elderly Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Previously Untreated or in First Relapse, or Previously Treated Myelodysplastic Syndromes), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Phase 2 Study of Oral Sapacitabine in Elderly Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Previously Untreated or in First Relapse, or Previously Treated Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Benchmarking treatment effects for patients over 70 with acute myeloid leukemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of geriatric oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Trial
- REVEAL-1, a phase 2 dose regimen optimization study of vosaroxin in older poor-risk patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukaemia.British journal of haematology · 2015Trial
- Prediction of survival with lower intensity therapy among older patients with acute myeloid leukemia.Cancer · 2023Article
- Differences between intrinsic and acquired nucleoside analogue resistance in acute myeloid leukaemia cells.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2021Article
- Response and Toxicity to Cytarabine Therapy in Leukemia and Lymphoma: From Dose Puzzle to Pharmacogenomic Biomarkers.Cancers · 2021Review
- A systematic literature review of disease burden and clinical efficacy for patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia.American journal of blood research · 2021Review
- Targeting DNA Repair Pathways in Hematological Malignancies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- A comprehensive review of genetic alterations and molecular targeted therapies for the implementation of personalized medicine in acute myeloid leukemia.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2020Review
- CNDAC-Induced DNA Double-Strand Breaks Cause Aberrant Mitosis Prior to Cell Death.Molecular cancer therapeutics · 2019Article
- Clinical update on hypomethylating agents.International journal of hematology · 2019Review
- The evolution of antiviral nucleoside analogues: A review for chemists and non-chemists. Part II: Complex modifications to the nucleoside scaffold.Antiviral research · 2019Review
- Developing an instrument to assess patient preferences for benefits and risks of treating acute myeloid leukemia to promote patient-focused drug development.Current medical research and opinion · 2018Article
- Targeting BRCA1/2 deficient ovarian cancer with CNDAC-based drug combinations.Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2018Article
- Precision therapy for acute myeloid leukemia.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2018Review
- Advances in the drug therapies of acute myeloid leukemia (except acute wpromyelocytic leukemia).Drug design, development and therapy · 2018Review
- Novel Therapies for Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Are We Finally Breaking the Deadlock?Targeted oncology · 2017Review
- Treatment of Elderly Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Current treatment options in oncology · 2017Review
- Metabolism, Biochemical Actions, and Chemical Synthesis of Anticancer Nucleosides, Nucleotides, and Base Analogs.Chemical reviews · 2016Review
- Mechanism-Based Drug Combinations with the DNA Strand-Breaking Nucleoside Analog CNDAC.Molecular cancer therapeutics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAvailable treatments for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) have limited durable activity and unsatisfactory safety profiles in most elderly patients. We assessed the efficacy and toxicity of sapacitabine, a novel oral cytosine nucleoside analogue, in elderly patients with AML.
methodsIn this randomised, phase 2 study, we recruited patients with AML who were either treatment naive or at first relapse and who were aged 70 years or older from 12 centres in the USA. We used a computer-generated randomisation sequence to randomly allocate eligible patients to receive one of three schedules of oral sapacitabine (1:1:1; stratified by a history of AML treatment): 200 mg twice a day for 7 days (group A); 300 mg twice a day for 7 days (group B); and 400 mg twice a day for 3 days each week for 2 weeks (group C). All schedules were given in 28 day cycles. To confirm the safety and tolerability of dosing schedules, after 20 patients had been treated in a group we enrolled an expanded cohort of 20-25 patients to that group if at least four patients had achieved complete remission or complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery, and if the 30 day death rate was 20% or less. Our primary endpoint was 1-year overall survival, analysed by intention-to-treat (ie, patients who have received at least one dose of sapacitabine) in those patients who had been randomly allocated to treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00590187.
resultsBetween Dec 27, 2007, and April 21, 2009, we enrolled 105 patients: 86 patients were previously untreated and 19 were at first relapse. Of the 60 patients randomly allocated to treatment, 1-year overall survival was 35% (95% CI 16-59) in group A, 10% (2-33) in group B, and 30% (13-54) in group C. 14 (13%) of 105 patients died within 30 days and 27 (26%) died within 60 days. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were anaemia (eight of 40 patients in group A, 12 of 20 patients in group B, and 15 of 45 patients in group C), neutropenia (14 in group A, 10 in group B, 11 in group C), thrombocytopenia (24 in group A, 12 in group B, and 22 in group C), febrile neutropenia (16 in group A, nine in group B, and 22 in group C), and pneumonia (seven in group A, five in group B, and 10 in group C). The most common grade 5 events were pneumonia (two in group A, one in group B, and three in group C) and sepsis (six in group A, three in group B, and one in group C). Seven deaths were thought to be probably or possibly related to sapacitabine treatment.
interpretationSapacitabine seems active and tolerable in elderly patients with AML. The 400 mg dose schedule had the best efficacy profile. Future investigations should aim to combine sapacitabine with other low-intensity therapies in elderly patients with AML.
fundingCyclacel Limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.