Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23075569›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2012

Trends in population mental health before and after the 2008 recession: a repeat cross-sectional analysis of the 1991-2010 Health Surveys of England.

Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi, Claire L Niedzwiedz, Frank Popham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Work-Related Stress, Physio-Pathological Mechanisms, and the Influence of Environmental Genetic Factors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. The Global Polycrisis and Health Inequalities.International journal of social determinants of health and health services · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Inflation hardship, gender, and mental health.SSM - population health · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Gender Gap in Mental Health during the COVID-19 Pandemic in South Korea: A Decomposition Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Relationship between Income and Mental Health during the COVID-19 Pandemic in China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  19. Effects of the Great Recession on Educational Disparities in Cardiometabolic Health.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2022
    Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Srinivasa Vittal KatikireddiEvaluation of Social Interventions Programme, MRC/CSO Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, Glasgow, UK.
Claire L Niedzwiedz
Frank Popham

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess short-term differences in population mental health before and after the 2008 recession and explore how and why these changes differ by gender, age and socio-economic position.

designRepeat cross-sectional analysis of survey data.

settingEngland.

participantsRepresentative samples of the working age (25-64 years) general population participating in the Health Survey for England between 1991 and 2010 inclusive.

main outcome measuresPrevalence of poor mental health (caseness) as measured by the general health questionnaire-12 (GHQ).

resultsAge-sex standardised prevalence of GHQ caseness increased from 13.7% (95% CI 12.9% to 14.5%) in 2008 to 16.4% (95% CI 14.9% to 17.9%) in 2009 and 15.5% (95% CI 14.4% to 16.7%) in 2010. Women had a consistently greater prevalence since 1991 until the current recession. However, compared to 2008, men experienced an increase in age-adjusted caseness of 5.1% (95% CI 2.6% to 7.6%, p<0.001) in 2009 and 3% (95% CI 1.2% to 4.9%, p=0.001) in 2010, while no statistically significant changes were seen in women. Adjustment for differences in employment status and education level did not account for the observed increase in men nor did they explain the differential gender patterning. Over the last decade, socio-economic inequalities showed a tendency to increase but no clear evidence for an increase in inequalities associated with the recession was found. Similarly, no evidence was found for a differential effect between age groups.

conclusionsPopulation mental health in men has deteriorated within 2 years of the onset of the current recession. These changes, and their patterning by gender, could not be accounted for by differences in employment status. Further work is needed to monitor recessionary impacts on health inequalities in response to ongoing labour market and social policy changes.

Identifiers

PMID23075569
PMCPMC3488736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.