Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23075138›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2013

Peak provoked craving: an alternative to smoking cue-reactivity.

Michael A Sayette, Stephen T Tiffany

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Differences in Magnitude of Cue Reactivity Across Durations of Smoking History: A Meta-analysis.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Food cue reactivity and craving predict eating and weight gain: a meta-analytic review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Neuroimaging craving: urge intensity matters.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2015
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. External validity of analogue sexual risk laboratory data.Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2023
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Pleasant olfactory cues can reduce cigarette craving.Journal of abnormal psychology · 2019
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Gender differences in responses to cues presented in the natural environment of cigarette smokers.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2015
    Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A Person-Centered Analysis of Craving in Smoking-Cue-Exposure Research.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael A SayetteUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA. sayette@pitt.edu
Stephen T Tiffany

Funding

AFFECTIVE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSESS IN SMOKING CRAVINGR01DA010605 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SAYETTE, MICHAEL ANDREW · 1996 to 2005
$875k
Affective and Cognitive Processes in Smoking CravingR01CA159463 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SAYETTE, MICHAEL ANDREW · 2010 to 2012
$585k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA10605-10NCI NIH HHS R01 CA159463NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA010605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smoking cue-exposure research has provided a powerful tool for examining cravings in the laboratory. A key attraction of this method is that tightly controlled experimental procedures can model craving experiences that are presumed to relate to addiction. Despite its appeal, key assumptions underlying the clinical relevance of smoking cue-reactivity studies have been questioned recently. For both conceptual and methodological reasons it may be difficult to tease apart cue-based and abstinence-based cravings. Moreover, conventional cue-reactivity procedures typically generate levels of craving with only minimal clinical relevance. We argue here that sometimes it is unfeasible-and in some instances conceptually misguided-to disentangle abstinence-based and cued components of cigarette cravings. In light of the challenges associated with cue-reactivity research, we offer an alternative approach to smoking cue-exposure experimental research focusing on peak provoked craving (PPC) states. The PPC approach uses nicotine-deprived smokers and focuses on urges during smoking cue-exposure without subtracting out urge ratings during control cue or baseline assessments. This design relies on two factors found in many cue-exposure studies-nicotine deprivation and exposure to explicit smoking cues-which, when combined, can create powerful craving states. The PPC approach retains key aspects of the cue-exposure method, and in many circumstances may be a viable design for studies examining robust laboratory-induced cravings.

Indexed as

CuesBehavior, AddictiveHumansMotivationRecurrenceSmokingSmoking CessationTobacco Use Disorder

Identifiers

PMID23075138
PMCPMC3549313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.