Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23075133›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2015

Building an online community to promote communication and collaborative learning between health professionals and young people who self-harm: an exploratory study.

Christabel Owens, Siobhan Sharkey, Janet Smithson, Elaine Hewis, Tobit Emmens, Tamsin Ford, Ray Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Status Quo of Professional⁻Patient Relations in the Internet Era: Bibliometric and Co-Word Analyses.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christabel OwensDevon Partnership NHS Trust, Exeter, UK; Peninsula Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Siobhan Sharkey
Janet Smithson
Elaine Hewis
Tobit Emmens
Tamsin Ford
Ray Jones

Funding

Department of Health RC-PG-0407-10098Medical Research Council G108/625
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOnline communities are known to break down barriers between supposed experts and non-experts and to promote collaborative learning and 'radical trust' among members. Young people who self-harm report difficulties in communicating with health professionals, and vice versa.

aimWe sought to bring these two groups together online to see how well they could communicate with each other about self-harm and its management, and whether they could agree on what constituted safe and relevant advice.

methodsWe allocated 77 young people aged 16-25 with experience of self-harm and 18 recently/nearly qualified professionals in relevant health-care disciplines to three separate Internet discussion forums. The forums contained different proportions of professionals to young people (none; 25%; 50% respectively) to allow us to observe the effect of the professionals on online interaction.

resultsThe young people were keen to share their lived experience of self-harm and its management with health professionals. They engaged in lively discussion and supported one another during emotional crises. Despite registering to take part, health professionals did not actively participate in the forums. Reported barriers included lack of confidence and concerns relating to workload, private-professional boundaries, role clarity, duty of care and accountability. In their absence, the young people built a vibrant lay community, supported by site moderators.

conclusionsHealth professionals may not yet be ready to engage with young people who self-harm and to exchange knowledge and experience in an anonymous online setting. Further work is needed to understand and overcome their insecurities.

Indexed as

InternetProfessional-Patient RelationsSocial SupportAdolescentAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCommunicationCooperative BehaviorFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMaleSelf-Injurious BehaviorStudents, Health OccupationsUnited KingdomYoung Adultcollaborative learningengagementInternetonline communitiesself-harmyoung people

Identifiers

PMID23075133
PMCPMC5060752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.