Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2013
Electrical stimulation therapy of the lower esophageal sphincter is successful in treating GERD: final results of open-label prospective trial.
Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02441400 (EndoStim Patient Registry-LES Stimulation System for the Treatment of GERD), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
EndoStim Patient Registry-LES Stimulation System for the Treatment of GERD
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-term results of electrical stimulation of the lower esophageal sphincter for treatment of proximal GERD.Surgical endoscopy · 2014Trial
- A programmable and self-adaptive ultrasonic wireless implant for personalized chronic pain management.Nature electronics · 2025Article
- Therapeutic Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)-Is There Something Between PPI and Fundoplication? An Overview.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Prediction, prevention and management of gastroesophageal reflux after per-oral endoscopic myotomy: An update.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024Review
- Neuromodulation for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review.Journal of translational gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Anti-reflux mucosectomy for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Endoscopy international open · 2022Review
- Effect of electrical stimulation therapy of the lower esophageal sphincter in GERD patients with ineffective esophageal motility.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Barrett's Esophagus and Intestinal Metaplasia.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- An Animal Study of Implantation of an Esophageal Pacemaker Based on Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy Approach for Alleviation of Esophageal Peristalsis Disorders.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2020Article
- Gastroparesis in the 2020s: New Treatments, New Paradigms.Current gastroenterology reports · 2020Review
- Novel Therapies for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Beyond Proton Pump Inhibitors.Current gastroenterology reports · 2020Review
- Electrical lower esophageal sphincter augmentation in patients with GERD and severe ineffective esophageal motility-a safety and efficacy study.Surgical endoscopy · 2019Article
- Wirelessly Powered Endoscopically Implantable Devices into the Submucosa as the Possible Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2019Article
- Autonomous and Rechargeable Microneurostimulator Endoscopically Implantable into the Submucosa.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2018Article
- Novel Surgical Treatments for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Systematic Review of Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation and Electric Stimulation Therapy.Gastroenterology research · 2018Review
- Development of an Autonomous Endoscopically Implantable Submucosal Microdevice Capable of Neurostimulation in the Gastrointestinal Tract.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2017Article
- Refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease.Gastroenterology report · 2015Review
- Electrical stimulation to increase lower esophageal sphincter pressure after POEM.Surgical endoscopy · 2015Article
- Long-term maintenance effect of radiofrequency energy delivery for refractory GERD: a decade later.Surgical endoscopy · 2014Article
- Electrical stimulation therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundElectrical stimulation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) improves LES pressure without interfering with LES relaxation. The aim of this open-label pilot trial was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of long-term LES stimulation using a permanently implanted LES stimulator in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).
methodsGERD patients who were at least partially responsive to proton pump inhibitors (PPI) with abnormal esophageal pH, hiatal hernia ≤ 3 cm, and esophagitis ≤ LA grade C were included. Bipolar stitch electrodes were placed in the LES and an IPG was placed in a subcutaneous pocket. Electrical stimulation was delivered at 20 Hz, 215 μs, 3-8 mA in 30 min sessions. The number and timing of sessions was tailored to each patient's GERD profile. Patients were evaluated using GERD-HRQL, daily symptom and medication diaries, SF-12, esophageal pH, and high-resolution manometry.
results24 patients (mean age = 53 years, SD = 12 years; 14 men) were implanted; 23 completed their 6-month evaluation. Median GERD-HRQL scores at 6 months was 2.0 (IQR = 0-5.5) and was significantly better than both baseline on-PPI [9.0 (range = 6.0-10.0); p < 0.001] and off-PPI [23 (21-25); p < 0.001] GERD-HRQL. Median% 24-h esophageal pH < 4.0 at baseline was 10.1 and improved to 5.1 at 6 months (p < 0.001). At their 6-month follow-up, 91 % (21/23) of the patients were off PPI and had significantly better median GERD-HRQL on LES stimulation compared to their on-PPI GERD-HRQL at baseline (9.0 vs. 2.0; p < 0.001). There were no unanticipated implantation- or stimulation-related adverse events or untoward sensation due to stimulation. There were no reports of treatment-related dysphagia, and manometric swallow was also unaffected.
conclusionsElectrical stimulation of the LES is safe and effective for treating GERD. There is a significant and sustained improvement in GERD symptoms, esophageal pH, and reduction in PPI usage without any side effects with the therapy. Furthermore, the therapy can be optimized to address an individual patient's disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.