Evidence map›Paper›PMID 2307356›Full record

ArticleGenetics1990

The role of sdc-1 in the sex determination and dosage compensation decisions in Caenorhabditis elegans.

A M Villeneuve, B J Meyer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 1990. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. The worm solution: a chromosome-full of condensin helps gene expression go down.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2009
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Genetic interactions affecting touch sensitivity in Caenorhabditis elegans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1996
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A M VilleneuveDepartment of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge 02139.
B J Meyer
Massachusetts Institute of Technology · US

Funding

NEMATODE SEX DETERMINATIONR01GM030702 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI MEYER, BARBARA J · 1985 to 2018
$6.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM030702NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM30702
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our previous work demonstrated that mutations in the X-linked gene sdc-1 disrupt both sex determination and dosage compensation in Caenorhabditis elegans XX animals, suggesting that sdc-1 acts at a step that is shared by the sex determination and dosage compensation pathways prior to their divergence. In this report, we extend our understanding of early events in C. elegans sex determination and dosage compensation and the role played by sdc-1 in these processes. First, our analysis of 14 new sdc-1 alleles suggests that the phenotypes resulting from the lack of sdc-1 function are (1) an incompletely penetrant sexual transformation of XX animals toward the male fate, and (2) increased levels of X-linked gene transcripts in XX animals, correlated with XX-specific morphological defects but not significant XX-specific lethality. Further, all alleles exhibit strong maternal rescue for all phenotypes assayed. Second, temperature-shift experiments suggest that sdc-1 acts during the first half of embryogenesis in determining somatic sexual phenotype, long before sexual differentiation actually takes place, and consistent with our previous proposal that sdc-1 acts at an early step in the regulatory hierarchy controlling the choice of sexual fate. Other temperature-shift experiments suggest that sdc-1 may be involved in establishing but not maintaining the XX mode of dosage compensation. Third, a genetic mosaic analysis of sdc-1 produced an unusual result: the genotypic mosaics failed to display the sdc-1 sexual transformation phenotypes. This result suggests several possible interpretations: (1) sdc-1 is expressed immediately, in the one- or two-celled embryo; (2) sdc-1 acts non-cell-autonomously, such that expression of the gene in either the AB or P1 lineage can supply sdc-1(+) function to cells of the other lineage; (3) the X/A ratio is assessed immediately, in the one- or two-celled embryo; or (4) the X/A signal directs the choice of sexual fate in a non-cell-autonomous fashion. Finally, examination of the classes of sexual phenotypes produced in sdc-1 mutant strains suggests that different cells in the organism may not choose their sexual fates independently.

Indexed as

Dosage Compensation, GeneticGenesSex Determination AnalysisAllelesAnimalsCaenorhabditisChromosome MappingFemaleGenetic LinkageGenotypeMaleMosaicismPhenotypeSuppression, GeneticTemperatureX Chromosome

Identifiers

PMID2307356
PMCPMC1203913
OpenAlexW1952627742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.