Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23073312›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2013

Clinical and molecular cross-sectional study of a cohort of adult type III spinal muscular atrophy patients: clues from a biomarker study.

Francesco D Tiziano, Rosa Lomastro, Lorena Di Pietro, Maria Barbara Pasanisi, Stefania Fiori, Carla Angelozzi, Emanuela Abiusi, Corrado Angelini, Gianni Sorarù, Alessandra Gaiani and 14 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The impact of threeFrontiers in neurology · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. 25 years of the SMN genes: the Copernican revolution of spinal muscular atrophy.Acta myologica : myopathies and cardiomyopathies : official journal of the Mediterranean Society of Myology · 2020
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Novel challenges in spinal muscular atrophy - How to screen and whom to treat?Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Developing therapies for spinal muscular atrophy.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2016
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Francesco D TizianoMedical Genetics Institute, Catholic University, Rome, Italy. fdtiziano@rm.unicatt.it
Rosa Lomastro
Lorena Di Pietro
Maria Barbara Pasanisi
Stefania Fiori
Carla Angelozzi
Emanuela Abiusi
Corrado Angelini
Gianni Sorarù
Alessandra Gaiani
Tiziana Mongini
Liliana Vercelli
Gessica Vasco
Giuseppe Vita
Gian Luca Vita
Sonia Messina
Luisa Politano
Luigia Passamano
Grazia Di Gregorio
Cristina Montomoli
Chiara Orsi
Angela Campanella
Renato Mantegazza
Lucia Morandi
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta · ITUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITUniversity of Messina · ITUniversity of Padua · ITFondazione Ricerca Molinette · ITUniversity of Pavia · ITCatholic University of America · USUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proximal spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an autosomal recessive neuromuscular disorder caused by mutations of the SMN1 gene. Based on severity, three forms of SMA are recognized (types I-III). All patients usually have 2-4 copies of a highly homologous gene (SMN2), which produces insufficient levels of functional survival motor neuron (SMN) protein due to the alternative splicing of exon 7. The availability of potential candidates to the treatment of SMA has raised a number of issues, including the availability of biomarkers. This study was aimed at evaluating whether the quantification of SMN2 products in peripheral blood is a suitable biomarker for SMA. Forty-five adult type III patients were evaluated by Manual Muscle Testing, North Star Ambulatory Assessment scale, 6-min walk test, myometry, forced vital capacity, and dual X-ray absorptiometry. Molecular assessments included SMN2 copy number, levels of full-length SMN2 (SMN2-fl) transcripts and those lacking exon 7 and SMN protein. Clinical outcome measures strongly correlated to each other. Lean body mass correlated inversely with years from diagnosis and with several aspects of motor performance. SMN2 copy number and SMN protein levels were not associated with motor performance or transcript levels. SMN2-fl levels correlated with motor performance in ambulant patients. Our results indicate that SMN2-fl levels correlate with motor performance only in patients preserving higher levels of motor function, whereas motor performance was strongly influenced by disease duration and lean body mass. If not taken into account, the confounding effect of disease duration may impair the identification of potential SMA biomarkers.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBiomarkersBiomechanical PhenomenaBody WeightCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGenetic LociGenotypeHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotor ActivityRange of Motion, ArticularRNA, MessengerBiomarkersRNA, MessengerSurvival of Motor Neuron 2 Protein

Identifiers

PMID23073312
PMCPMC3658179
OpenAlexW2020562145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.