Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23072918›Full record

ReviewBone2013

In vitro and in vivo approaches to study osteocyte biology.

Ivo Kalajzic, Brya G Matthews, Elena Torreggiani, Marie A Harris, Paola Divieti Pajevic, Stephen E Harris

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bone, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 151 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Bone Organoids: A Novel Tool for Modeling and Managing Skeletal Disorders in Diabetes.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  4. New knock-in mouse linesJBMR plus · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Why Animal Experiments Are Still Indispensable in Bone Research: A Statement by the European Calcified Tissue Society.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ivo KalajzicDepartment of Reconstructive Sciences, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut 06032, USA. ikalaj@neuron.uchc.edu
Brya G Matthews
Elena Torreggiani
Marie A Harris
Paola Divieti Pajevic
Stephen E Harris
UConn Health · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Notch Signaling and Bone Fracture HealingR01AR055607 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI Kurt David Hankenson, IVO Kalajzic · 2011 to 2026
$6.3M
Evaluation of Osteocyte Dedifferentiation ProcessR21AR059315 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI KALAJZIC, IVO · 2010 to 2011
$371k
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR055607NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR059315
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteocytes, the most abundant cell population of the bone lineage, have been a major focus in the bone research field in recent years. This population of cells that resides within mineralized matrix is now thought to be the mechanosensory cell in bone and plays major roles in the regulation of bone formation and resorption. Studies of osteocytes had been impaired by their location, resulting in numerous attempts to isolate primary osteocytes and to generate cell lines representative of the osteocytic phenotype. Progress has been achieved in recent years by utilizing in vivo genetic technology and generation of osteocyte directed transgenic and gene deficiency mouse models. We will provide an overview of the current in vitro and in vivo models utilized to study osteocyte biology. We discuss generation of osteocyte-like cell lines and isolation of primary osteocytes and summarize studies that have utilized these cellular models to understand the functional role of osteocytes. Approaches that attempt to selectively identify and isolate osteocytes using fluorescent protein reporters driven by regulatory elements of genes that are highly expressed in osteocytes will be discussed. In addition, recent in vivo studies utilizing overexpression or conditional deletion of various genes using dentin matrix protein (Dmp1) directed Cre recombinase are outlined. In conclusion, evaluation of the benefits and deficiencies of currently used cell lines/genetic models in understanding osteocyte biology underlines the current progress in this field. The future efforts will be directed towards developing novel in vitro and in vivo models that would additionally facilitate in understanding the multiple roles of osteocytes.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedBiomechanical PhenomenaBone and BonesGene Expression RegulationHumansOsteoblastsOsteocytes

Identifiers

PMID23072918
PMCPMC3566324
OpenAlexW2170161195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.