ArticleDrug safety2012
Global patterns of adverse drug reactions over a decade: analyses of spontaneous reports to VigiBase™.
Article in Drug safety, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
82 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A Systematic Review of Pharmacovigilance Systems in Developing Countries Using the WHO Pharmacovigilance Indicators.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2022Pooled it
- Intensive Monitoring Studies for Assessing Medicines: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Epidemiology of Antiretroviral Therapy Related Adverse Drug Reactions and its Predictors Among Patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus/AIDS in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS CarePooled it
- Regulatory challenges and current policy for cardiotoxicity detection in oncology drug development.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Review
- Knowledge, attitudes and practices of health care professionals towards pharmacovigilance in Georgia.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Patterns of Spontaneous Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting in Germany From 2012 to 2021.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2026Article
- The Burden of Adverse Drug Reactions in Africa in the Context of Pharmacogenetics-Based Clinical Guidelines.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Trends and Patterns of Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting in Sierra Leone: A Retrospective Analysis of VigiFlow Data (2008-2022).Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2026Article
- Adverse drug reactions associated with doxorubicin and epirubicin: A descriptive analysis from VigiBase.Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners · 2026Article
- Inner ear signs and symptoms induced by antidepressants: a disproportionality analysis based on the FAERS database.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Cytopenias as Adverse Drug Reactions: A 10-Year Analysis of Reporting Structure, Rate, and Trend.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Understanding Underreporting of Adverse Drug Reactions in the Philippines: A Mixed Methods Study.Drugs - real world outcomes · 2025Article
- Article
- Cannabinoids and Adverse Convulsive Effects: A Pharmacovigilance and Addictovigilance Analysis of Cases Reported in France.Fundamental & clinical pharmacology · 2025Article
- An Evaluation Benchmark for Adverse Drug Event Prediction from Clinical Trial Results.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Probing the in-depth analysis of Serious Adverse Drug Reactions in a tertiary care hospital of Central India.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2025Article
- Medication Hazards and Outcome Patterns of Pediatric Drug-Associated Liver Injury in Taiwan: An Analysis of 1998-2017 Spontaneous Adverse Drug Reaction Reports.Drugs - real world outcomes · 2025Article
- Characteristics and trends in adverse drug reactions in Ghana-evidence of spontaneous reports, 2005-2021.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Article
- Does the risk of hypersensitivity reactions to iopromide differ by sex, race, or across regions/countries? An analysis of 152 233 patients from 4 observational studies and the company's pharmacovigilance database.The British journal of radiology · 2024Article
- An Exploratory Bibliometric Analysis of African Pharmacovigilance Research Output Using SCOPUS.Cureus · 2024Review
22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough systems to collect information about suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were established in many countries and by the WHO in the 1960s, few studies have examined reported ADRs related to national income.
objectiveThe aim of the study was to characterize ADRs reported to the WHO-ADR database, VigiBase™, and to relate data to national income.
methodsWe analysed ADR reports submitted to VigiBase™ from 2000 to 2009 with respect to reporting rate, age and sex of patient, type, seriousness and medications. Reports were also analysed with respect to national income level, classified in accordance with the World Bank definition: low, lower-middle, upper-middle and high.
resultsWe analysed 1,359,067 ADR reports including 3,013,074 ADRs. Overall, 16% of reports were serious and 60% were reported for females. High-income countries had the highest ADR reporting rates (range 3-613 reports/million inhabitants/year) and low-income countries the lowest (range 0-21). Distribution of ADRs across income groups with respect to age group, seriousness and sex was non-significant. Overall, the majority of ADRs were reported for nervous system medications, followed by cardiovascular medicines. Low-income countries reported relatively more ADRs for antiinfectives for systemic use than high-income countries, and high-income countries reported more ADRs for antineoplastic and immunomodulating agents than lower-income groups.
conclusionThis study showed that high-income countries had the highest ADR reporting rates and low-income countries the lowest, with large variations across countries in each group. Significant differences in ADR reporting rates were only found for ADRs of the type 'skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders' and for the therapeutic groups 'antiinfectives for systemic use' and 'antineoplastic and immunomodulation agents'. To strengthen ADR reporting rates, especially in low-income countries, more research is needed about the impact of organizational structures and economic resources of national pharmacovigilance centres and ADR reporting practices on the large variations in ADR reporting rates within income groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23072620What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.