Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23071609›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Measles virus glycoprotein-based lentiviral targeting vectors that avoid neutralizing antibodies.

Sabrina Kneissl, Tobias Abel, Anke Rasbach, Julia Brynza, Jürgen Schneider-Schaulies, Christian J Buchholz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. FromImmune network · 2026
    Review
  4. In vivo CAR cell therapy: from bench to bedside.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. CD90-targeted lentiviral vectors for HSC gene therapy.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Improving Molecular Therapy in the Kidney.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2020
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sabrina KneisslMolecular Biotechnology and Gene Therapy, Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Langen, Germany. Sabrina.Kneissl@pei.de
Tobias Abel
Anke Rasbach
Julia Brynza
Jürgen Schneider-Schaulies
Christian J Buchholz
Paul Ehrlich Institut · DEUniversity of Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lentiviral vectors (LVs) are potent gene transfer vehicles frequently applied in research and recently also in clinical trials. Retargeting LV entry to cell types of interest is a key issue to improve gene transfer safety and efficacy. Recently, we have developed a targeting method for LVs by incorporating engineered measles virus (MV) glycoproteins, the hemagglutinin (H), responsible for receptor recognition, and the fusion protein into their envelope. The H protein displays a single-chain antibody (scFv) specific for the target receptor and is ablated for recognition of the MV receptors CD46 and SLAM by point mutations in its ectodomain. A potential hindrance to systemic administration in humans is pre-existing MV-specific immunity due to vaccination or natural infection. We compared transduction of targeting vectors and non-targeting vectors pseudotyped with MV glycoproteins unmodified in their ectodomains (MV-LV) in presence of α-MV antibody-positive human plasma. At plasma dilution 1:160 MV-LV was almost completely neutralized, whereas targeting vectors showed relative transduction efficiencies from 60% to 90%. Furthermore, at plasma dilution 1:80 an at least 4-times higher multiplicity of infection (MOI) of MV-LV had to be applied to obtain similar transduction efficiencies as with targeting vectors. Also when the vectors were normalized to their p24 values, targeting vectors showed partial protection against α-MV antibodies in human plasma. Furthermore, the monoclonal neutralizing antibody K71 with a putative epitope close to the receptor binding sites of H, did not neutralize the targeting vectors, but did neutralize MV-LV. The observed escape from neutralization may be due to the point mutations in the H ectodomain that might have destroyed antibody binding sites. Furthermore, scFv mediated cell entry via the target receptor may proceed in presence of α-MV antibodies interfering with entry via the natural MV receptors. These results are promising for in vivo applications of targeting vectors in humans.

Indexed as

Transduction, GeneticVirus InternalizationAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralGenetic TherapyGenetic VectorsGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHEK293 CellsHemagglutinins, ViralHumansLentivirusMeasles virusRecombinant Fusion ProteinsViral Fusion ProteinsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, Viralenhanced green fluorescent proteinGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHemagglutinins, ViralRecombinant Fusion ProteinsViral Fusion Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23071609
PMCPMC3468630
OpenAlexW2082601853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.