Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23071521›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2012

Microarray meta-analysis identifies acute lung injury biomarkers in donor lungs that predict development of primary graft failure in recipients.

Pingzhao Hu, Xinchen Wang, Jack J Haitsma, Suleiman Furmli, Hussain Masoom, Mingyao Liu, Yumiko Imai, Arthur S Slutsky, Joseph Beyene, Celia M T Greenwood and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisValidation Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Research advances in consistency and variability inJournal of thoracic disease · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Pingzhao HuThe Centre for Applied Genomics, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Xinchen Wang
Jack J Haitsma
Suleiman Furmli
Hussain Masoom
Mingyao Liu
Yumiko Imai
Arthur S Slutsky
Joseph Beyene
Celia M T Greenwood
Claudia dos Santos
St. Michael's Hospital · CAAkita University · JPHospital for Sick Children · CAMcGill University Health Centre · CAPopulation Health Research Institute · CAUniversity Health Network · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo perform a meta-analysis of gene expression microarray data from animal studies of lung injury, and to identify an injury-specific gene expression signature capable of predicting the development of lung injury in humans.

methodsWe performed a microarray meta-analysis using 77 microarray chips across six platforms, two species and different animal lung injury models exposed to lung injury with or/and without mechanical ventilation. Individual gene chips were classified and grouped based on the strategy used to induce lung injury. Effect size (change in gene expression) was calculated between non-injurious and injurious conditions comparing two main strategies to pool chips: (1) one-hit and (2) two-hit lung injury models. A random effects model was used to integrate individual effect sizes calculated from each experiment. Classification models were built using the gene expression signatures generated by the meta-analysis to predict the development of lung injury in human lung transplant recipients.

resultsTwo injury-specific lists of differentially expressed genes generated from our meta-analysis of lung injury models were validated using external data sets and prospective data from animal models of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). Pathway analysis of gene sets revealed that both new and previously implicated VILI-related pathways are enriched with differentially regulated genes. Classification model based on gene expression signatures identified in animal models of lung injury predicted development of primary graft failure (PGF) in lung transplant recipients with larger than 80% accuracy based upon injury profiles from transplant donors. We also found that better classifier performance can be achieved by using meta-analysis to identify differentially-expressed genes than using single study-based differential analysis.

conclusionTaken together, our data suggests that microarray analysis of gene expression data allows for the detection of "injury" gene predictors that can classify lung injury samples and identify patients at risk for clinically relevant lung injury complications.

Indexed as

Acute Lung InjuryAnimalsBiomarkersCell LineDatabases, FactualGene Expression ProfilingHumansLungLung TransplantationMicroarray AnalysisModels, AnimalOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisRatsBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID23071521
PMCPMC3470558
OpenAlexW2023263942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.