Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23071490›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Genome-wide characterization of pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients using next generation sequencing.

Winnie S Liang, David W Craig, John Carpten, Mitesh J Borad, Michael J Demeure, Glen J Weiss, Tyler Izatt, Shripad Sinari, Alexis Christoforides, Jessica Aldrich and 19 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Next-Generation Sequencing: An Advanced Diagnostic Tool for Detection of Pancreatic Disease/Disorder.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Current Status of Circulating Tumor DNA Liquid Biopsy in Pancreatic Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  10. Frontiers in oncology · 2020
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Winnie S LiangTranslational Genomics Research Institute (TGen), Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America.
David W Craig
John Carpten
Mitesh J Borad
Michael J Demeure
Glen J Weiss
Tyler Izatt
Shripad Sinari
Alexis Christoforides
Jessica Aldrich
Ahmet Kurdoglu
Michael Barrett
Lori Phillips
Hollie Benson
Waibhav Tembe
Esteban Braggio
Jeffrey A Kiefer
Christophe Legendre
Richard Posner
Galen H Hostetter
Angela Baker
Jan B Egan
Haiyong Han
Douglas Lake
Edward C Stites
Ramesh K Ramanathan
Rafael Fonseca
A Keith Stewart
Daniel Von Hoff

Funding

Validation of Amplified Genes in Pancreatic CancerP01CA109552 · NCI · TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INST · PI VON HOFF, DANIEL D · 2005 to 2009
$15.2M
Highly Parallel Supercomputing for Translational ResearchS10RR025056 · NCRR · TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INST · PI SUH, EDWARD B · 2008 to 2008
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA109552NCRR NIH HHS 1S10RR25056-01NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR025056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) is among the most lethal malignancies. While research has implicated multiple genes in disease pathogenesis, identification of therapeutic leads has been difficult and the majority of currently available therapies provide only marginal benefit. To address this issue, our goal was to genomically characterize individual PAC patients to understand the range of aberrations that are occurring in each tumor. Because our understanding of PAC tumorigenesis is limited, evaluation of separate cases may reveal aberrations, that are less common but may provide relevant information on the disease, or that may represent viable therapeutic targets for the patient. We used next generation sequencing to assess global somatic events across 3 PAC patients to characterize each patient and to identify potential targets. This study is the first to report whole genome sequencing (WGS) findings in paired tumor/normal samples collected from 3 separate PAC patients. We generated on average 132 billion mappable bases across all patients using WGS, and identified 142 somatic coding events including point mutations, insertion/deletions, and chromosomal copy number variants. We did not identify any significant somatic translocation events. We also performed RNA sequencing on 2 of these patients' tumors for which tumor RNA was available to evaluate expression changes that may be associated with somatic events, and generated over 100 million mapped reads for each patient. We further performed pathway analysis of all sequencing data to identify processes that may be the most heavily impacted from somatic and expression alterations. As expected, the KRAS signaling pathway was the most heavily impacted pathway (P<0.05), along with tumor-stroma interactions and tumor suppressive pathways. While sequencing of more patients is needed, the high resolution genomic and transcriptomic information we have acquired here provides valuable information on the molecular composition of PAC and helps to establish a foundation for improved therapeutic selection.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanAdenocarcinomaBase SequenceBRCA2 ProteinDNA RepairFemaleGene DosageHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleMetabolic Networks and PathwaysPancreatic NeoplasmsProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)ras ProteinsBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanKRAS protein, humanMYC protein, humanProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)ras ProteinsTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID23071490
PMCPMC3468610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.