ArticlePLoS genetics2012
Mismatch repair balances leading and lagging strand DNA replication fidelity.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
86 citing papers in PubMed, 135 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evidence that MutSβ repairs indels generated by mispair initiated template slippage.DNA repair · 2026Article
- Intra-strain genetic heterogeneity in Toxoplasma gondii ME49: Oxford Nanopore long-read sequencing reveals copy number variation in the ROP8-ROP2A locus.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- The mutational landscape of Bacillus subtilis conditional hypermutators shows how proofreading skews DNA polymerase error rates.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- A tale of two strands: Decoding chromatin replication through strand-specific sequencing.Molecular cell · 2025Review
- Widespread mutagenesis and chromosomal instability shape somatic genomes in systemic sclerosis.Nature communications · 2024Article
- High fidelity DNA ligation prevents single base insertions in the yeast genome.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Chromatin assembly factor-1 preserves genome stability inCell stress · 2023Article
- The COMPASS subunit Spp1 protects nascent DNA at the Tus/Ter replication fork barrier by limiting DNA availability to nucleases.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Strand asymmetries across genomic processes.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Review
- Molecular basis for processing of topoisomerase 1-triggered DNA damage by Apn2/APE2.Cell reports · 2022Article
- Mismatch repair is a double-edged sword in the battle against microsatellite instability.Expert reviews in molecular medicine · 2022Review
- Article
- Genomic signature of MTOR could be an immunogenicity marker in human colorectal cancer.BMC cancer · 2022Article
- Highly efficient prime editing by introducing same-sense mutations in pegRNA or stabilizing its structure.Nature communications · 2022Article
- PrimPol: A Breakthrough among DNA Replication Enzymes and a Potential New Target for Cancer Therapy.Biomolecules · 2022Review
- How asymmetric DNA replication achieves symmetrical fidelity.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2021Article
- A replication-linked mutational gradient drives somatic mutation accumulation and influences germline polymorphisms and genome composition in mitochondrial DNA.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- Strand discrimination in DNA mismatch repair.DNA repair · 2021Review
26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The two DNA strands of the nuclear genome are replicated asymmetrically using three DNA polymerases, α, δ, and ε. Current evidence suggests that DNA polymerase ε (Pol ε) is the primary leading strand replicase, whereas Pols α and δ primarily perform lagging strand replication. The fact that these polymerases differ in fidelity and error specificity is interesting in light of the fact that the stability of the nuclear genome depends in part on the ability of mismatch repair (MMR) to correct different mismatches generated in different contexts during replication. Here we provide the first comparison, to our knowledge, of the efficiency of MMR of leading and lagging strand replication errors. We first use the strand-biased ribonucleotide incorporation propensity of a Pol ε mutator variant to confirm that Pol ε is the primary leading strand replicase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We then use polymerase-specific error signatures to show that MMR efficiency in vivo strongly depends on the polymerase, the mismatch composition, and the location of the mismatch. An extreme case of variation by location is a T-T mismatch that is refractory to MMR. This mismatch is flanked by an AT-rich triplet repeat sequence that, when interrupted, restores MMR to > 95% efficiency. Thus this natural DNA sequence suppresses MMR, placing a nearby base pair at high risk of mutation due to leading strand replication infidelity. We find that, overall, MMR most efficiently corrects the most potentially deleterious errors (indels) and then the most common substitution mismatches. In combination with earlier studies, the results suggest that significant differences exist in the generation and repair of Pol α, δ, and ε replication errors, but in a generally complementary manner that results in high-fidelity replication of both DNA strands of the yeast nuclear genome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.