ArticlePLoS genetics2012
Faster-X evolution of gene expression in Drosophila.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed, 94 citations in OpenAlex.
- A population genomic resource for Drosophila pseudoobscura.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Comparative single-nucleus transcriptomics reveals asymmetric evolution of the Drosophila male and female germlines.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- Population genomics ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- A high-resolution crossover landscape in Drosophila santomea reveals rapid and concerted evolution of multiple properties of crossing over control.PLoS genetics · 2025Article
- Dichotomous transcriptome divergence at the cell-type level between thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Quantifying Transcriptome Turnover on Phylogenies by Modeling Gene Expression as a Binary Trait.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Evolution and genetics of accessory gland transcriptome divergence between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.Genetics · 2024Article
- Evidence of Nonrandom Patterns of Functional Chromosome Organization in Danaus plexippus.Genome biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Positive Selection Drives cis-regulatory Evolution Across the Threespine Stickleback Y Chromosome.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Enrichment of Hard Sweeps on the X Chromosome in Drosophila melanogaster.Molecular biology and evolution · 2023Article
- Sex differences in interindividual gene expression variability across human tissues.PNAS nexus · 2022Article
- Induction and inhibition of Drosophila X chromosome gene expression are both impeded by the dosage compensation complex.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- Meiotic, genomic and evolutionary properties of crossover distribution in Drosophila yakuba.PLoS genetics · 2022Article
- Molecular Evolution across Mouse Spermatogenesis.Molecular biology and evolution · 2022Article
- Divergence of X-linked trans regulatory proteins and the misexpression of gene targets in sterile Drosophila pseudoobscura hybrids.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- Transitions to asexuality and evolution of gene expression inProceedings. Biological sciences · 2021Article
- Sex-biased gene expression and recent sex chromosome turnover.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021Article
- Intraspecific Transcriptome Variation and Sex-Biased Expression in Anopheles arabiensis.Genome biology and evolution · 2021Article
- Widespread misregulation of inter-species hybrid transcriptomes due to sex-specific and sex-chromosome regulatory evolution.PLoS genetics · 2021Article
- The haplolethality paradox of the wupA gene in Drosophila.PLoS genetics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
DNA sequences on X chromosomes often have a faster rate of evolution when compared to similar loci on the autosomes, and well articulated models provide reasons why the X-linked mode of inheritance may be responsible for the faster evolution of X-linked genes. We analyzed microarray and RNA-seq data collected from females and males of six Drosophila species and found that the expression levels of X-linked genes also diverge faster than autosomal gene expression, similar to the "faster-X" effect often observed in DNA sequence evolution. Faster-X evolution of gene expression was recently described in mammals, but it was limited to the evolutionary lineages shortly following the creation of the therian X chromosome. In contrast, we detect a faster-X effect along both deep lineages and those on the tips of the Drosophila phylogeny. In Drosophila males, the dosage compensation complex (DCC) binds the X chromosome, creating a unique chromatin environment that promotes the hyper-expression of X-linked genes. We find that DCC binding, chromatin environment, and breadth of expression are all predictive of the rate of gene expression evolution. In addition, estimates of the intraspecific genetic polymorphism underlying gene expression variation suggest that X-linked expression levels are not under relaxed selective constraints. We therefore hypothesize that the faster-X evolution of gene expression is the result of the adaptive fixation of beneficial mutations at X-linked loci that change expression level in cis. This adaptive faster-X evolution of gene expression is limited to genes that are narrowly expressed in a single tissue, suggesting that relaxed pleiotropic constraints permit a faster response to selection. Finally, we present a conceptional framework to explain faster-X expression evolution, and we use this framework to examine differences in the faster-X effect between Drosophila and mammals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.