ArticlePLoS genetics2012
The many landscapes of recombination in Drosophila melanogaster.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 345 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
345 citing papers in PubMed, 596 citations in OpenAlex.
- Allelic gene conversion softens selective sweeps.Genetics · 2026Article
- Diversity and divergence of two sympatric, sibling octopus species.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- High‑resolution recombination landscape in Iranian native chicken ecotypes: Elevated hotspot density and candidate genes for heat and drought adaptation.Poultry science · 2026Article
- Haplotype structure: an overlooked key factor shaping the genomic selection response.Genetics · 2026Article
- Gene-level complexity explains genome-wide variation in the distribution of fitness effects.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Incorporating experimental mortality improves statistical inference of crossover patterning along meiotic chromosomes.Genetics · 2026Article
- Genome-wide crossover analysis in the holocentric pantry moth reveals strong crossover assurance and interference during spermatogenesis.Genome research · 2026Article
- Sex-Specific Landscapes of Crossover and Noncrossover Recombination in Coppery Titi Monkeys (Plecturocebus cupreus).Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- The rights and wrongs of rescaling in population genetics simulations.PLoS genetics · 2026Review
- Estimating the evolutionary fitness of specific synonymous codon changes.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- OutbredbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Non-uniform chromosomal SNP density biases sites of meiotic crossovers in Drosophila melanogaster.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- NATURAL VARIATION IN RADIOTOLERANCE IS ASSOCIATED WITH DIFFERENCES IN INNATE IMMUNE ACTIVITY AND S-PHASE TRANSCRIPTION IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Chromosome-specific differences in the recombination landscape of spontaneous meiotic nondisjunction.Genetics · 2026Article
- Overdominance for fitness: a genomic comparison between empirical and simulated data with Drosophila melanogaster.Genetics · 2026Article
- Why recombination hotspots?PLoS genetics · 2026Review
- Beyond Exons: Linking Noncoding Heritability and Polygenicity across Complex Human Traits and Disorders.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Meiotic double-strand DNA breaks and spontaneous mutation in Drosophila melanogaster.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Seasonal fluctuations in fitness result in severe reductions in effective population size.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Genetic Footprints of Seasonal Fluctuating Selection: A Comparison With Established Selection Forms.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
285 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Recombination is a fundamental biological process with profound evolutionary implications. Theory predicts that recombination increases the effectiveness of selection in natural populations. Yet, direct tests of this prediction have been restricted to qualitative trends due to the lack of detailed characterization of recombination rate variation across genomes and within species. The use of imprecise recombination rates can also skew population genetic analyses designed to assess the presence and mode of selection across genomes. Here we report the first integrated high-resolution description of genomic and population variation in recombination, which also distinguishes between the two outcomes of meiotic recombination: crossing over (CO) and gene conversion (GC). We characterized the products of 5,860 female meioses in Drosophila melanogaster by genotyping a total of 139 million informative SNPs and mapped 106,964 recombination events at a resolution down to 2 kilobases. This approach allowed us to generate whole-genome CO and GC maps as well as a detailed description of variation in recombination among individuals of this species. We describe many levels of variation in recombination rates. At a large-scale (100 kb), CO rates exhibit extreme and highly punctuated variation along chromosomes, with hot and coldspots. We also show extensive intra-specific variation in CO landscapes that is associated with hotspots at low frequency in our sample. GC rates are more uniformly distributed across the genome than CO rates and detectable in regions with reduced or absent CO. At a local scale, recombination events are associated with numerous sequence motifs and tend to occur within transcript regions, thus suggesting that chromatin accessibility favors double-strand breaks. All these non-independent layers of variation in recombination across genomes and among individuals need to be taken into account in order to obtain relevant estimates of recombination rates, and should be included in a new generation of population genetic models of the interaction between selection and linkage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.