Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23070367›Full record

ArticleEMBO reports2012

Functional divergence of gene duplicates through ectopic recombination.

Joaquin F Christiaens, Sebastiaan E Van Mulders, Jorge Duitama, Chris A Brown, Maarten G Ghequire, Luc De Meester, Jan Michiels, Tom Wenseleers, Karin Voordeckers, Kevin J Verstrepen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EMBO reports, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Paralogs of thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Multicellular group formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Joaquin F ChristiaensDepartment of Microbial and Molecular Systems, Centre of Microbial and Plant Genetics (CMPG), KU Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 22, B-3001 Leuven (Heverlee), Belgium.
Sebastiaan E Van Mulders
Jorge Duitama
Chris A Brown
Maarten G Ghequire
Luc De Meester
Jan Michiels
Tom Wenseleers
Karin Voordeckers
Kevin J Verstrepen
KU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene duplication stimulates evolutionary innovation as the resulting paralogs acquire mutations that lead to sub- or neofunctionalization. A comprehensive in silico analysis of paralogs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals that duplicates of cell-surface and subtelomeric genes also undergo ectopic recombination, which leads to new chimaeric alleles. Mimicking such intergenic recombination events in the FLO (flocculation) family of cell-surface genes shows that chimaeric FLO alleles confer different adhesion phenotypes than the parental genes. Our results indicate that intergenic recombination between paralogs can generate a large set of new alleles, thereby providing the raw material for evolutionary adaptation and innovation.

Indexed as

Recombination, GeneticAllelesCell AdhesionEvolution, MolecularGene DuplicationGene Expression Regulation, FungalGenetic VariationMannose-Binding LectinsMutationPhenotypeSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSequence Homology, Amino AcidFLO1 protein, S cerevisiaeMannose-Binding LectinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23070367
PMCPMC3512402
OpenAlexW2102357774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.