Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23070364›Full record

ArticleEMBO reports2012

Mammalian proapoptotic factor ChaC1 and its homologues function as γ-glutamyl cyclotransferases acting specifically on glutathione.

Akhilesh Kumar, Shweta Tikoo, Shuvadeep Maity, Shantanu Sengupta, Sagar Sengupta, Amandeep Kaur, Anand Kumar Bachhawat

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EMBO reports, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 120 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
120citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

120 citing papers in PubMed, 204 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Dissecting Complex Interactions Between Ferroptosis and the Proteasome.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

60 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Akhilesh KumarCSIR-Institute of Microbial Technology, Sector 39-A, Chandigarh 160036, India.
Shweta Tikoo
Shuvadeep Maity
Shantanu Sengupta
Sagar Sengupta
Amandeep Kaur
Anand Kumar Bachhawat
National Institute of Immunology · INIndian Institute of Science Education and Research Mohali · INCouncil of Scientific and Industrial Research · INInstitute of Genomics and Integrative Biology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ChaC1 is a mammalian proapoptic protein of unknown function induced during endoplasmic reticulum stress. We show using in vivo studies and novel in vitro assays that the ChaC family of proteins function as γ-glutamyl cyclotransferases acting specifically to degrade glutathione but not other γ-glutamyl peptides. The overexpression of these proteins (but not the catalytically dead E>Q mutants) led to glutathione depletion and enhanced apoptosis in yeast. The ChaC family is conversed across all phyla and represents a new pathway for glutathione degradation in living cells, and the first cytosolic pathway for glutathione degradation in mammalian cells.

Indexed as

gamma-GlutamyltransferaseGlutathioneNerve Tissue ProteinsAnimalsApoptosisCatalytic DomainEndoplasmic Reticulum StressEscherichia coliGene Expression RegulationMicePeptidesProtein ConformationProtein FoldingPyrrolidonecarboxylic AcidSaccharomyces cerevisiaeVesicular Transport Proteinsgamma-GlutamyltransferaseGlutathioneNerve Tissue ProteinsPeptidesPyrrolidonecarboxylic AcidVesicular Transport ProteinsVps13a protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID23070364
PMCPMC3512401
OpenAlexW2106077567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.