Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23069863›Full record

ArticleDer Unfallchirurg2014

[Reimbursement for kyphoplasty in the Germann diagnosis-related groups system 2011/2012. Material costs versus treatment costs].

A Krüger, L Oberkircher, S Ruchholtz, M Wollny

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Unfallchirurg, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A KrügerKlinik für Unfall-, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen-Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35043, Gießen-Marburg, Deutschland, akrueger@med.uni-marburg.de.
L Oberkircher
S Ruchholtz
M Wollny
Philipps University of Marburg · DEUniversitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures by means of kyphoplasty is an accepted and safe procedure.

aimIn Germany the reimbursement for kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty differs greatly. The growing diversity of suppliers and systems makes a comparison possible and necessary. Besides the illustration of kyphoplasty in the German diagnosis-related group (G-DRG) system and the amendments for 2012 we analyzed the procedures and associated costs.

methodUsing the example of two manufacturers and different system approaches, both of which can be charged as kyphoplasty, we try to point out the importance of selecting exact comparison parameters. In particular material and treatment costs are compared for both methods.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overDiagnosis-Related GroupsFemaleGermanyHealth Care CostsHumansInsurance, Health, ReimbursementKyphoplastyMaleMiddle AgedOsteoporotic FracturesPrevalenceSpinal Fractures

Identifiers

PMID23069863
OpenAlexW1009074990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.