Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23069375›Full record

ArticleBone2013

Rosiglitazone disrupts endosteal bone formation during distraction osteogenesis by local adipocytic infiltration.

Lichu Liu, James Aronson, Beata Lecka-Czernik

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Oral anti-diabetic drugs and fracture risk, cut to the bone: safe or dangerous? A narrative review.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2015
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Current Protocols in Mouse Biology.Current protocols in mouse biology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lichu LiuLaboratory for Limb Regeneration Research, Arkansas Children's Hospital Research Institute, 3 Children's Way, Little Rock, AR 72202, USA.
James Aronson
Beata Lecka-Czernik
Arkansas Children's Hospital · USUniversity of Toledo Medical Center · US

Funding

Regional Pilot And Feasibility Study Grants ProgramP30DK020572 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Mehboob A Hussain · 2013 to 2026
$24.3M
Bone loss with aging occurs due to increased PPAR-g activity in marrow stem cellsR01AG028935 · NIA · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI LECKA-CZERNIK, BEATA ANNA · 2006 to 2010
$1.5M
NIA NIH HHS AG 028935NIA NIH HHS R01 AG028935NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK020572
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rosiglitazone (Rosi) is a drug in the thiazolidinedione class for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), which binds and activates PPARγ nuclear receptor in fat cells, sensitizing them to insulin. Despite proven antidiabetic efficacy, Rosi therapy may be associated with trabecular bone loss and an increased risk of fractures. To examine the potential side effects of Rosi treatment on bone formation, we delivered Rosi to mice using a combined model of distraction osteogenesis (DO) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). DO provides a unique method to isolate the sequence of intramembranous bone formation, an important component of both fracture healing and bone homeostasis. Four groups of n=6 mice were used to compare the effects of Rosi on bone formation and cellular composition in both diabetic (Avy/a strain) and non-diabetic mice (a/a strain). New bone formation was examined by high resolution radiographs, micro-computed tomography, and histology. Precursor cells in the distraction gap were quantitated using immunohistochemical stains for proliferating cell nuclear antigen. Committed osteoblasts and adipocytes in the gap were identified and quantitated by immunostaining for osteocalcin and FABP4/aP2, respectively. The diabetic model developed obesity, hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance, while the control littermates remained lean, normoglycemic and insulin sensitive. Rosi treatment decreased levels of non-fasted glucose and insulin and improved insulin sensitivity in the A(vy)/a mice, but had no effect in a/a mice, indicating antidiabetic efficacy of Rosi at the tested dose. Despite the diabetic, obese mice having twice the number of fat cells in their marrow than the non-diabetic mice, bone formation using DO was not adversely affected by the diabetes itself. However, Rosi treatment significantly diminished intramembranous endosteal bone formation, while increasing adipogenesis in and adjacent to the distraction gap up to 3.5- to 3.8-fold in both diabetic and non-diabetic models. This effect was independent of the anti-diabetic therapeutic response. These results raise the question of whether osteoblast precursors are inhibited in their development or actually converted to adipocytic phenotypes, possibly via marrow fat PPARγ nuclear receptor.

Indexed as

Osteogenesis, DistractionAdipocytesAnimalsBone DevelopmentHypoglycemic AgentsImmunohistochemistryMiceRosiglitazoneThiazolidinedionesTomography, X-Ray ComputedHypoglycemic AgentsRosiglitazoneThiazolidinediones

Identifiers

PMID23069375
PMCPMC3513662
OpenAlexW2010875685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.