Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23069206›Full record

ArticleCell transplantation2013

Inhibition of recall responses through complementary therapies targeting CD8+ T-cell- and alloantibody-dependent allocytotoxicity in sensitized transplant recipients.

Jason M Zimmerer, Phillip H Horne, Lori A Fiessinger, Mason G Fisher, Kartika Jayashankar, Sierra F Garcia, Mahmoud Abdel-Rasoul, Nico van Rooijen, Ginny L Bumgardner

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell transplantation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Integrins in T Cell Physiology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jason M ZimmererDepartment of Surgery, Comprehensive Transplant Center, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210-1250, USA.
Phillip H Horne
Lori A Fiessinger
Mason G Fisher
Kartika Jayashankar
Sierra F Garcia
Mahmoud Abdel-Rasoul
Nico van Rooijen
Ginny L Bumgardner
The Ohio State University · USThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · US

Funding

Novel Mechanisms Regulating Posttransplant Humoral AlloimmunityR01AI083456 · NIAID · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BUMGARDNER, GINNY L · 2011 to 2014
$1.5M
Pre-Conditioning Pancreatic Islets for TransplantationR21DK072262 · NIDDK · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BUMGARDNER, GINNY L · 2005 to 2006
$406k
CD8+ T cell regulation of alloantibody production following transplantationF32DK082148 · NIDDK · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ZIMMERER, JASON M. · 2009 to 2010
$97k
NIAID NIH HHS AI083456NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI083456NIDDK NIH HHS DK072262NIDDK NIH HHS F32 DK082148NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK072262
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Allospecific T memory cell responses in transplant recipients arise from environmental exposure to previous transplantation or cross-reactive heterologous immunity. Unfortunately, these memory responses pose a significant barrier to the survival of transplanted tissue. We have previously reported that concurrent inhibition of CD154 and LFA-1 suppresses primary CD8-dependent rejection responses that are not controlled by conventional immunosuppressive strategies. We hypothesized that CD154- and LFA-1-mediated inhibition, by targeting activation as well as effector functions, may also be efficacious for the control of alloreactive CD8+ T-cell responses in sensitized hosts. We found that treatment with anti-LFA-1 mAb alone enhanced transplant survival and reduced CD8-mediated cytotoxicity in sensitized CD4 KO recipients. However, treatment with anti-CD154 mAb alone did not have an effect. Notably, when both CD4- and CD8-dependent rejection pathways are operative (wild-type sensitized recipients), LFA-1 significantly inhibited CD8-mediated in vivo allocytotoxicity but did not correspond with enhanced hepatocyte survival. We hypothesized that this was due to alloantibody-mediated rejection. When anti-LFA-1 mAb treatment was combined with macrophage depletion, which we have previously reported impairs alloantibody-mediated parenchymal cell damage, in vivo cytotoxic effector function was significantly decreased and was accompanied by significant enhancement of hepatocyte survival in sensitized wild-type recipients. Therefore, LFA-1 is a potent therapeutic target for reduction of CD8-mediated cytotoxicity in sensitized transplant recipients and can be combined with other treatments that target non-CD8-mediated recall alloimmunity.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalCD40 LigandCD4 AntigensCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesGraft RejectionGraft SurvivalHepatocytesImmunotherapyIsoantibodiesLiverMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutTransplantation, HomologousAntibodies, Monoclonalanti-LFA-1 monoclonal antibodyCD40 LigandCD4 AntigensIsoantibodies

Identifiers

PMID23069206
PMCPMC3726262
OpenAlexW2074419025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.