Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23068913›Full record

ReviewInternational journal for parasitology2012

Finding the sweet spots of inhibition: understanding the targets of a functional antibody against Plasmodium vivax Duffy binding protein.

Francis B Ntumngia, Christopher L King, John H Adams

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal for parasitology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Characterizing the genetic diversity of the monkey malaria parasite Plasmodium cynomolgi.Infection, genetics and evolution : journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Francis B NtumngiaDepartment of Global Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Christopher L King
John H Adams
University of South Florida · USCenter for Global Health · US

Funding

Immunological characterization of the P. vivax DBPR01AI064478 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI ADAMS, JOHN H · 2006 to 2023
$9.6M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI064478PHS HHS R01 A1064478
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plasmodium vivax Duffy binding protein region II (DBPII) is an essential ligand for reticulocyte invasion, thereby making this molecule an attractive vaccine candidate against asexual blood-stage P. vivax. Similar to other Plasmodium blood-stage vaccine candidates, strain-specific immunity due to DBPII allelic variation may complicate vaccine efficacy. Targeting immune responses to more conserved epitopes that are potential targets of strain-transcending neutralising immunity is necessary to avoid induction of strain-specific responses to dominant variant epitopes. In this article, we focus on different approaches to optimise the design of DBP immunogenicity to target conserved epitopes, which is important for developing a broadly effective vaccine against P. vivax.

Indexed as

Malaria VaccinesAmino Acid SequenceAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, ProtozoanBinding Sites, AntibodyEpitopesHumansMalaria, VivaxPlasmodium vivaxPolymorphism, GeneticProtozoan ProteinsReceptors, Cell SurfaceAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, ProtozoanDuffy antigen binding protein, PlasmodiumEpitopesMalaria VaccinesProtozoan ProteinsReceptors, Cell Surface

Identifiers

PMID23068913
PMCPMC4301681
OpenAlexW2089941610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.