Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23068594›Full record

ArticleJournal of athletic training

Practice-based research networks, part II: a descriptive analysis of the athletic training practice-based research network in the secondary school setting.

Tamara C Valovich McLeod, Kenneth C Lam, R Curtis Bay, Eric L Sauers, Alison R Snyder Valier, Athletic Training Practice-Based Research Network

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of athletic training. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Quality Improvement in Athletic Health Care.Journal of athletic training · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tamara C Valovich McLeodAthletic Training Program, A.T. Still University, 5850 E. Still Circle, Mesa, AZ 85206, USA. tmcleod@atsu.edu
Kenneth C Lam
R Curtis Bay
Eric L Sauers
Alison R Snyder Valier
Athletic Training Practice-Based Research Network

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextAnalysis of health care service models requires the collection and evaluation of basic practice characterization data. Practice-based research networks (PBRNs) provide a framework for gathering data useful in characterizing clinical practice.

objectiveTo describe preliminary secondary school setting practice data from the Athletic Training Practice-Based Research Network (AT-PBRN).

designDescriptive study.

settingSecondary school athletic training facilities within the AT-PBRN. PATIENTS OR OTHER

participantsClinicians (n = 22) and their patients (n = 2523) from the AT-PBRN. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): A Web-based survey was used to obtain data on clinical practice site and clinician characteristics. Patient and practice characteristics were obtained via deidentified electronic medical record data collected between September 1, 2009, and April 1, 2011. Descriptive data regarding the clinician and CPS practice characteristics are reported as percentages and frequencies. Descriptive analysis of patient encounters and practice characteristic data was performed, with the percentages and frequencies of the type of injuries recorded at initial evaluation, type of treatment received at initial evaluation, daily treatment, and daily sign-in procedures.

resultsThe AT-PBRN had secondary school sites in 7 states, and most athletic trainers at those sites (78.2%) had less than 5 years of experience. The secondary school sites within the AT-PBRN documented 2523 patients treated across 3140 encounters. Patients most frequently sought care for a current injury (61.3%), followed by preventive services (24.0%), and new injuries (14.7%). The most common diagnoses were ankle sprain/strain (17.9%), hip sprain/strain (12.5%), concussion (12.0%), and knee pain (2.5%). The most frequent procedures were athletic trainer evaluation (53.9%), hot- or cold-pack application (26.0%), strapping (10.3%), and therapeutic exercise (5.7%). The median number of treatments per injury was 3 (interquartile range = 2, 4; range = 2-19).

conclusionsThese preliminary data describe services provided by clinicians within the AT-PBRN and demonstrate the usefulness of the PBRN model for obtaining such data.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchEvidence-Based PracticePatient CarePhysical Education and TrainingEthics Committees, ResearchFemaleHumansMaleOutcome Assessment, Health CarePrimary Health CareSchoolsSports

Identifiers

PMID23068594
PMCPMC3465037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.