Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23067131›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2015

A patient perspective of pharmacist prescribing: 'crossing the specialisms-crossing the illnesses'.

Laura M McCann, Sharon L Haughey, Carole Parsons, Fran Lloyd, Grainne Crealey, Gerard J Gormley, Carmel M Hughes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Patient and public perspectives of community pharmacies in the United Kingdom: A systematic review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Exploring consumer experiences of pharmacist prescribing - a scoping review.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Pharmacist prescribing and care improves cardiovascular risk, but what do patients think? A substudy of the RCanadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laura M McCannSchool of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Sharon L Haughey
Carole Parsons
Fran Lloyd
Grainne Crealey
Gerard J Gormley
Carmel M Hughes

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe drive for non-medical prescribing has progressed quickly since the late 1990s and involves a range of healthcare professionals including pharmacists. As part of a commissioned research project, this qualitative element of a larger case study focused on the views of patients of pharmacist prescribers.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to explore patients' perspectives of pharmacists as prescribers.

methodsThree pharmacists working as independent prescribers in the clinical areas of (i) hypertension, (ii) cardiovascular/diabetes management, (iii) anticoagulation were recruited to three case studies of pharmacist prescribing in Northern Ireland. One hundred and five patients were invited to participate in focus groups after they had been prescribed for by the pharmacist. Focus groups took place between November 2010 and March 2011 (ethical/governance approvals granted) were audio taped, transcribed verbatim, read independently by two authors and analysed using constant comparative analysis.

resultsThirty-four patients agreed to participate across seven focus groups. Analysis revealed the emergence of one overarching theme: team approach to patient care. A number of subthemes related to the role of the pharmacist, the role of the doctor and patient benefits. There was an overwhelming lack of awareness of pharmacist prescribing. Patients discussed the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to their care and recognized limitations of the current model of prescribing.

conclusionPatients were positive about pharmacist prescribing and felt that a team approach to their care was the ideal model especially when treating those with more complex conditions. Despite positive attitudes, there was a general lack of awareness of this new mode of practice.

Indexed as

Drug PrescriptionsPatient SatisfactionPrescription DrugsProfessional-Patient RelationsAdultAnticoagulantsCardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes MellitusFemaleFocus GroupsHumansHypertensionMaleNorthern IrelandPharmacistsYoung AdultAnticoagulantsPrescription Drugsfocus groupsnon-medical prescribingNorthern Irelandpatient perspectivepharmacist prescribingqualitative methodology

Identifiers

PMID23067131
PMCPMC5060764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.