Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23066978›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes2012

Cognitive mechanisms for transitive inference performance in rhesus monkeys: measuring the influence of associative strength and inferred order.

Regina Paxton Gazes, Nicholas W Chee, Robert R Hampton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Monkeys (Macaca mulatta) rank lists using multiple cognitive mechanisms simultaneously.Journal of comparative psychology (Washington, D.C. : 1983) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Superstitious learning of abstract order from random reinforcement.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Transitive inference after minimal training in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Absolute and relative knowledge of ordinal position on implied lists.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Regina Paxton GazesDepartment of Psychology, Emory University, GA, USA. rgazes@zooatlanta.org
Nicholas W Chee
Robert R Hampton

Funding

Yerkes National Primate Research Center Role of type-I IFN in regulating COVID-19 induced inflammation and pathogenesisP51OD011132 · OD · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Joon Sup Lee · 2012 to 2026
$167.0M
Memory Monitoring and Declarative Memory: Behavior and BrainR01MH082819 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI HAMPTON, ROBERT R · 2008 to 2012
$2.0M
NCRR NIH HHS P51RR165NIH HHS P51 OD011132NIH HHS P51OD11132NIMH NIH HHS 1R01MH082819NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH082819
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

If Ben is taller than Emily and Emily is taller than Dina, one can infer that Ben is taller than Dina. This process of inferring relations between stimuli based on shared relations with other stimuli is called transitive inference (TI). Many species solve TI tasks in which they learn pairs of overlapping stimulus discriminations (A+B-, B+C-, etc.) and are tested with non-adjacent novel test pairings (BD). When relations between stimuli are determined by reinforcement (A is reinforced when paired with B, B when paired with C), performance can be controlled by the associative values of individual stimuli or by logical inference. In Experiment 1 rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) chose the higher ranked item on non-adjacent test trials after training on a 7-image TI task. In Experiment 2 we measured the associative values of 7 TI images and found that these values did not correlate with choice in TI tests. In Experiment 3 large experimental manipulations of the associative value of images did influence performance in some TI test pairings, but performance on other pairs was consistent with the implied order. In Experiment 4 monkeys linked two previously learned 7-item lists into one 14-item list after training with a single linking pair. Linking cannot be explained by associative values. Associative value can control choice in TI tests in at least some extreme circumstances. Implied order better explains most TI choices in monkeys, and is a more viable mechanism for TI of social dominance, which has been observed in birds and fish.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceAnimalsAssociation LearningAttentionChoice BehaviorCognitionDiscrimination, PsychologicalMacaca mulattaMalePattern Recognition, VisualPhotic StimulationProblem SolvingReaction TimeReinforcement, Psychology

Identifiers

PMID23066978
PMCPMC3774320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.