Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23066784›Full record

ReviewCytotherapy2012

Is CD34 truly a negative marker for mesenchymal stromal cells?

Ching-Shwun Lin, Hongxiu Ning, Guiting Lin, Tom F Lue

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cytotherapy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 113 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
113citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

113 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 231 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. First Experience of PersonalizedInternational journal of hematology-oncology and stem cell research · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

53 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ching-Shwun LinKnuppe Molecular Urology Laboratory, Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of California , San Francisco, California 94143 – 0738, USA. clin@urology.ucsf.edu
Hongxiu Ning
Guiting Lin
Tom F Lue
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Urinary Incontinence: Reproductive/Hormonal Risk FactorsP50DK064538 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BROWN, JEANETTE S · 2002 to 2011
$11.5M
Prevention and Treatment of ImpotenceR37DK045370 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LUE, TOM F · 2004 to 2013
$3.5M
Mechanism and Prevention of Female Stress Urinary IncontinenceR01DK069655 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LUE, TOM F · 2005 to 2013
$3.1M
TREATMENT AND PREVENTION OF IMPOTENCER01DK045370 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO · PI LUE, TOM F · 1994 to 2001
$631k
NIDDK NIH HHS DK045370NIDDK NIH HHS DK069655NIDDK NIH HHS DK64538NIDDK NIH HHS P50 DK064538NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK045370NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK069655NIDDK NIH HHS R37 DK045370
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevailing school of thought is that mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) do not express CD34, and this sets MSC apart from hematopoietic stem cells (HSC), which do express CD34. However, the evidence for MSC being CD34(-) is largely based on cultured MSC, not tissue-resident MSC, and the existence of CD34(-) HSC is in fact well documented. Furthermore, the Stro-1 antibody, which has been used extensively for the identification/isolation of MSC, was generated by using CD34(+) bone marrow cells as immunogen. Thus, neither MSC being CD34(-) nor HSC being CD34(+) is entirely correct. In particular, two studies that analyzed CD34 expression in uncultured human bone marrow nucleated cells found that MSC (BMSC) existed in the CD34(+) fraction. Several studies have also found that freshly isolated adipose-derived MSC (ADSC) express CD34. In addition, all of these ADSC studies and several other MSC studies have observed a disappearance of CD34 expression when the cells are propagated in culture. Thus the available evidence points to CD34 being expressed in tissue-resident MSC, and its negative finding being a consequence of cell culturing.

Indexed as

Antigens, CD34BiomarkersCell AdhesionHematopoietic Stem CellsHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsPlasticsAntigens, CD34BiomarkersPlastics

Identifiers

PMID23066784
PMCPMC3846603
OpenAlexW1978851576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.