Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23065979›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2012

ArcA and AppY antagonize IscR repression of hydrogenase-1 expression under anaerobic conditions, revealing a novel mode of O2 regulation of gene expression in Escherichia coli.

A D Nesbit, A S Fleischhacker, S J Teter, P J Kiley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Fe-S cluster homeostasis and beyond: The multifaceted roles of IscR.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular cell research · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

A D NesbitDepartment of Biomolecular Chemistry, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
A S Fleischhacker
S J Teter
P J Kiley

Funding

GRADUATE TRAINING IN MOLECULAR BIOSCIENCEST32GM007215 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI HULL, CHRISTINA M · 1985 to 2018
$22.5M
The Regulation of Gene Expression by OxygenR01GM045844 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI KILEY, PATRICIA J · 1991 to 2012
$4.4M
Studies of the regulation of IscR by [2Fe-2S] cluster bindingF32GM085987 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI FLEISCHHACKER, ANGELA SUE · 2008 to 2010
$143k
NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM085987NIGMS NIH HHS F32GM085987NIGMS NIH HHS GM07215NIGMS NIH HHS GM45844NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM045844NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007215
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcription of the Escherichia coli hydrogenase-1 operon (hyaABCDEF) is increased by the transcription factors ArcA and AppY under anaerobic growth conditions. However, IscR, which represses transcription of the hyaA promoter (P(hyaA)) under aerobic conditions, was not known to repress transcription of this promoter under anaerobic conditions. Here, we report that ArcA and AppY increase P(hyaA) expression under anaerobic conditions by antagonizing IscR binding at P(hyaA), since IscR repression is observed when either ArcA or AppY is eliminated. The ability of ArcA and AppY to act as antirepressors of IscR repression of P(hyaA) depended on IscR levels, suggesting that IscR competes with ArcA and/or AppY for binding. In support of this competition model, electrophoretic mobility shift assays and DNase I footprinting showed that the ArcA and IscR binding sites overlap and that binding of ArcA and IscR is mutually exclusive. Unexpectedly, IscR with a C92A mutation (IscR-C92A), which mimics the clusterless form of the protein that is present predominantly under aerobic conditions, was a better repressor under anaerobic conditions of both P(hyaA) and a constitutive promoter containing the IscR binding site from P(hyaA) than wild-type IscR, which is predominantly in the [2Fe-2S] form under anaerobic conditions. This observation could not be explained by differences in DNA binding affinities or IscR levels, so we conclude that [2Fe-2S]-IscR is a weaker repressor of P(hyaA) than clusterless IscR. In sum, a combination of ArcA and AppY antirepression of IscR function, lower levels of IscR, and weak repression by [2Fe-2S]-IscR leads to increased P(hyaA) expression under anaerobic conditions.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, BacterialAnaerobiosisBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsBinding SitesDNA FootprintingElectrophoretic Mobility Shift AssayEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsHydrogenaseMutationOxygenPromoter Regions, GeneticProtein BindingRepressor ProteinsTrans-ActivatorsTranscription FactorsAppY protein, E coliarcA protein, E coliBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsEscherichia coli ProteinsHydrogenaseIscR protein, E coliOxygenRepressor ProteinsTrans-ActivatorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID23065979
PMCPMC3510566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.