Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23065775›Full record

ArticleGenetic epidemiology2013

Adjustment for population stratification via principal components in association analysis of rare variants.

Yiwei Zhang, Weihua Guan, Wei Pan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetic epidemiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genetic Analysis of Functional Rare Germline Variants across Nine Cancer Types from an Electronic Health Record Linked Biobank.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A pathway-centric approach to rare variant association analysis.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2016
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yiwei ZhangDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455-0392, USA.
Weihua Guan
Wei Pan

Funding

Powerful Inference and Prediction for Genetic AssociationR01HL105397 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI PAN, WEI, SHEN, XIAOTONG TOM · 2011 to 2018
$2.9M
New Machine Learning Tools for Biomedical DataR01GM081535 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI PAN, WEI, SHEN, XIAOTONG TOM · 2007 to 2014
$2.2M
Statistical Methods for Genomic and Proteomic DataR01HL065462 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI PAN, WEI · 2002 to 2012
$1.5M
Gene-set pathway analysis of GWAS data for T2DM and related quantitative traitsR21DK089351 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BASU, SAONLI · 2010 to 2011
$394k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL065462NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL105397NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL105397NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL65462NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK089351NIDDK NIH HHS R21DK089351NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM081535NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM081535
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For unrelated samples, principal component (PC) analysis has been established as a simple and effective approach to adjusting for population stratification in association analysis of common variants (CVs, with minor allele frequencies MAF > 5%). However, it is less clear how it would perform in analysis of low-frequency variants (LFVs, MAF between 1% and 5%), or of rare variants (RVs, MAF < 5%). Furthermore, with next-generation sequencing data, it is unknown whether PCs should be constructed based on CVs, LFVs, or RVs. In this study, we used the 1000 Genomes Project sequence data to explore the construction of PCs and their use in association analysis of LFVs or RVs for unrelated samples. It is shown that a few top PCs based on either CVs or LFVs could separate two continental groups, European and African samples, but those based on only RVs performed less well. When applied to several association tests in simulated data with population stratification, using PCs based on either CVs or LFVs was effective in controlling Type I error rates, while nonadjustment led to inflated Type I error rates. Perhaps the most interesting observation is that, although the PCs based on LFVs could better separate the two continental groups than those based on CVs, the use of the former could lead to overadjustment in the sense of substantial power loss in the absence of population stratification; in contrast, we did not see any problem with the use of the PCs based on CVs in all our examples.

Indexed as

Gene FrequencyGenetics, PopulationModels, GeneticPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePrincipal Component AnalysisAsian PeopleBlack PeopleComputer SimulationHuman Genome ProjectHumansModels, StatisticalWhite People

Identifiers

PMID23065775
PMCPMC4066816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.