Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23065691›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2013

KRAS G>A mutation favors poor tumor differentiation but may not be associated with prognosis in patients with curatively resected duodenal adenocarcinoma.

Tao Fu, Angela A Guzzetta, Jana Jeschke, Rajita Vatapalli, Pujan Dave, Craig M Hooker, Richard Morgan, Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue, Baohua Liu, Nita Ahuja

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Molecular Aberrations in Periampullary Carcinoma.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2017
    Article
  9. Clinicopathologic and prognostic associations of KRAS and BRAF mutations in small intestinal adenocarcinoma.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Tao FuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400042, China.
Angela A Guzzetta
Jana Jeschke
Rajita Vatapalli
Pujan Dave
Craig M Hooker
Richard Morgan
Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue
Baohua Liu
Nita Ahuja
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center · USArmy Medical University · CN

Funding

Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Rosalie Wollett · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
TGF-beta Signaling in Pancreatic Cancer ProgressionR01CA140599 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI IACOBUZIO-DONAHUE, CHRISTINE A · 2009 to 2013
$1.7M
Epigenetic markers involved in colorectal cancer recurrence and metastasesK23CA127141 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI AHUJA, NITA · 2008 to 2012
$705k
NCI NIH HHS CA127141NCI NIH HHS CA140599NCI NIH HHS K23 CA127141NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973NCI NIH HHS R01 CA140599
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

KRAS mutations have been found in duodenal adenocarcinomas and may have prognostic significance. The purpose of this study was to classify clinicopathological characteristics, microsatellite instability and KRAS mutations and identify possible prognostic role of KRAS mutations in duodenal adenocarcinomas. Demographics, tumor characteristics and survival were recorded for 78 patients with duodenal adenocarcinomas (Stages I-III). KRAS mutations were detected in 27 (34.6%) cases, of which the majority (74.1%) were G>A transitions. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that KRAS G>A mutation was significantly associated with late stage (p = 0.025) and poor tumor differentiation (p = 0.035), when compared with wild-type and other than G>A mutations. KRAS G>A mutation carriers were at increased risk for distant relapse (p = 0.022) and had significantly shorter overall survival (OS; log-rank p = 0.045) and a trend toward shorter relapse-free survival (RFS; log-rank p = 0.062) when compared with those who did not carry the KRAS G>A mutation. In multivariate analyses, there was a significant correlation between ≥ 3 positive lymph nodes and poor OS (p < 0.001) and RFS (p = 0.001) and KRAS G>A mutation carriers demonstrated no effect on clinical outcome. In conclusion, KRAS G>A mutation correlates significantly with late stage and poor tumor differentiation in duodenal adenocarcinoma. Among patients who undergo a curative resection of duodenal adenocarcinoma, KRAS G>A mutation carriers will more likely experience distant relapse but may not exhibit a poor prognosis. The number of positive lymph nodes should be incorporated in future staging systems.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationAdenocarcinomaBiomarkers, TumorDNA, NeoplasmDuodenal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMicrosatellite RepeatsMiddle AgedMutationNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPolymerase Chain ReactionPrognosisProto-Oncogene ProteinsBiomarkers, TumorDNA, NeoplasmKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)ras Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23065691
PMCPMC3579006
OpenAlexW1967201038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.