Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23065444›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2012

Level of phosphohistone H3 among various types of human cancers.

Amy Sun, Wei Zhou, Jared Lunceford, Peter Strack, Lisa M Dauffenbach, Christopher A Kerfoot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Best Practices Recommendations for Diagnostic Immunohistochemistry in Lung Cancer.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Grading and Prognostication of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Pancreas: A Comparison Study of Ki67 and PHH3.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. High phosphohistone H3 expression correlates with adverse clinical, biological, and pathological factors in neuroblastomas.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amy SunMerck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA.
Wei Zhou
Jared Lunceford
Peter Strack
Lisa M Dauffenbach
Christopher A Kerfoot

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAnti-phosphorylated histone H3 (pHH3) antibodies specifically detect the core protein histone H3 only when phosphorylated at serine 10 (Ser10) or serine 28 (Ser28). Measurement of pHH3 levels can be used for quantifying mitosis and the effectiveness of mitotic inhibitors in early drug development. However, data on the expression level of pHH3 (Ser10) and pHH3 (Ser28) among different cancers are limited. This study was designed to investigate the expression levels of pHH3 across different types of cancers, using uniform techniques and assay platforms in a single laboratory.

designRetrospective study.

settingSingle laboratory. SPECIMENS: Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded various human cancer specimens were provided by Mosaic Laboratories Tissue Bank. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Using immunohistochemistry, pHH3 levels were measured using both pHH3 (Ser10) and (Ser28) antibodies among 10 human melanoma and 10 ovarian tumour samples. The samples were reviewed blindly by two reviewers. pHH3 (Ser10) was then selected to measure the pHH3 levels in cancers of breast, colorectal, oesophageal, gastric, head and neck and lung (n=5 for each cancer).

resultsThe pHH3 (Ser10) expression was higher than pHH3 (Ser28) in both melanoma and ovarian cancers (p<0.01), with the mean (SD) levels of 1.28% (0.47%) for Ser10 and 0.53% (0.44%) for Ser28 among melanoma and 3.47% (3.51%) for Ser10 and 0.62% (0.68%) for Ser28 among ovarian cancers, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed among different cancer types tested for pHH3 using Ser10 (p=0.197). No reviewer effect was identified.

conclusionsThe pHH3 Ser10 was significantly higher than Ser28 and may serve as the more robust of two pHH3 assays for measuring mitotic index.

Identifiers

PMID23065444
PMCPMC3488750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.