Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23065228›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology reports2013

RAD51 polymorphisms and breast cancer risk.

Mojgan Hosseini, Massoud Houshmand, Ahmad Ebrahimi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Modification ofInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Association between RAD51 polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility: a meta analysis.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mojgan HosseiniDepartment of Science, Islamshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sayad Shirazi St., Islamshahr, Tehran, Iran. mojgan-Hosseini@iiau.ac.ir
Massoud Houshmand
Ahmad Ebrahimi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer (BC) is one of the most common causes of death among women, and second in Iran. The objectives of this study were to determine the frequency of RAD51 G/C polymorphism in patients with breast cancer. We evaluated these polymorphisms and effects on the breast cancer risk association in a Iranian sporadic population-based case-control study of 294 breast cancer cases and 315 controls using a PCR-RFLP-based assay. Analyses of affected and controls show that homozygote genotype RAD51 GG has the highest frequency in both groups (33.3 in patients and 41.4 in control group). Genotype RAD51 GG most risk factor were in our population: [CC/GC odds ratio, 0.364 (95 % confidence interval; CI, 0.168-0.788) p = 0.009, CC/GG odds ratio, 0.828 (95 % CI, 0.411-1.668) p = 0.596], GG/GC odds ratio, 2.276 (95 % CI, 1.497-3.460) p = 0.001]. There was a significant association of breast cancer risk with RAD51 GG and CC polymorphism.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, GeneticAdultAllelesBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesFemaleGene FrequencyGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenotypeHumansMiddle AgedRad51 RecombinaseRad51 Recombinase

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.