Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23065177›Full record

SynthesisJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2012

Follicular flushing during oocyte retrieval: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Matheus Roque, Marcos Sampaio, Selmo Geber

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03353285 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Follicle Flushing on Oocyte Fertilization Rate

TypeobservationalSponsorEugoniaRan2017 to 2018Enrolled60ConditionsInfertilityArmsintracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)
NCT03354858 completednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Oocyte Recovery Rate Following Follicular Flushing Versus Direct Aspiration in Women Undergoing IVF

TypeobservationalSponsorEugoniaRan2017 to 2018Enrolled20ConditionsInfertilityArmsFollicular flushing
NCT05473455 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Does Addition of Follicular Flushing to the Initial Aspiration Lead to Higher Numbers of Oocytes Retrieved in Women Undergoing Oocyte Retrieval? A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorEugoniaRan2022 to 2022Enrolled105ConditionsInfertilityArmsExperimental: Follicular aspiration with addition of follicular flushing.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matheus RoqueOrigen - Center for Reproductive Medicine, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Marcos Sampaio
Selmo Geber

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the literature and identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs), in order to answer if performing follicular flushing during the oocyte retrieval may improve the assisted reproductive technologies (ART) outcomes.

methodsAn exhaustive electronic search was performed using MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. Only RCTs comparing follicular flushing to aspiration only during ART, were included. We included 5 trials, with a total of 482 patients randomized, with median ages ranging from 30.5 to 37.1.

resultsThe data analyses did not show significant differences regarding live birth rate, clinical pregnancies rates, and the number of oocytes retrieved. The duration of oocyte retrieval was significantly increased in the follicular flushing group.

conclusionsThe results from this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that there is no advantage to use of routine follicular flushing during OR in an unselected group of patients.

Indexed as

Ovarian FollicleAdultFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansOocyte RetrievalPregnancyPregnancy RateRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID23065177
PMCPMC3510361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.