Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23064901›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2013

Variation in medication use in cancer patients at the end of life: a cross-sectional analysis.

N J H Raijmakers, L van Zuylen, C J Furst, M Beccaro, L Maiorana, P Pilastri, C Rossi, G Flego, A van der Heide, M Costantini

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Polypharmacy, chemotherapy receipt, and medication-related out-of-pocket costs at end of life among commercially insured adults with advanced cancer.Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Nurses' Perspectives on Family Caregiver Medication Management Support and Deprescribing.Journal of hospice and palliative nursing : JHPN : the official journal of the Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association · 2019
    Article
  8. Clinicians' perceptions of medication errors with opioids in cancer and palliative care services: a priority setting report.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Medication use during end-of-life care in a palliative care centre.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2015
    Article
  13. Changes in medication profile among patients with advanced cancer admitted to an acute palliative care unit.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2015
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Commonly prescribed medications in a population of hospice patients.The American journal of hospice & palliative care · 2014
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

N J H RaijmakersDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. n.raijmakers@erasmusmc.nl
L van Zuylen
C J Furst
M Beccaro
L Maiorana
P Pilastri
C Rossi
G Flego
A van der Heide
M Costantini
Ospedale Policlinico San Martino · ITErasmus MC · NLVilla Torri Hospital · ITStockholm South General Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDespite advances in cancer treatment, patients still die with unnecessary suffering. Therefore, high-quality end-of-life care is needed. Variations in medication use at the end of life may suggest areas for improvement. This study aims to describe the use of medications during the last days of life of cancer patients and to explore the possibility of using it as a quality measure.

methodsWe conducted an international survey on experts' opinions regarding potentially inappropriate medications for dying patients. Subsequently, a chart review of deceased cancer patients was conducted, which assessed the current medication use in different settings.

resultsThe mean number of medications used in the last 3 days of life was 4.8 (SD 2.1). Hospital patients were less likely than hospice patients to receive opioids, midazolam, haloperidol, and drugs for pulmonary secretions or nausea/vomiting. Over 90 % of experts rated 12 medications as unlikely to be appropriate. Hospital patients were more likely than hospice patients to receive these potentially inappropriate medications. Before the implementation of an end-of-life care pathway, hospital patients had a higher probability, than after, to receive potentially inappropriate medication. Moreover, after implementation of such pathway, patients for whom a pathway was not used were more likely to receive potentially inappropriate medications than patients for whom it was used.

conclusionMedication use at the end of life varies widely by setting, both for potentially appropriate and inappropriate medications. Combining experts' opinion and current medication use resulted in the identification of 16 medications that might be used to assess the quality of cancer care at the end of life.

Indexed as

Inappropriate PrescribingPractice Patterns, Physicians'AgedConfidence IntervalsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansItalyMaleMedical AuditMiddle AgedNeoplasmsOdds RatioQuality Indicators, Health CareRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID23064901
OpenAlexW2074522232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.