ArticleExperimental brain research2013
Static and dynamic visual cues in feed-forward postural control.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single session of direction-specific training using auditory cues improves anticipatory postural adjustments to lateral perturbations.Experimental brain research · 2024Article
- Linearity and repeatability of postural responses in relation to peak force and impulse of manually delivered perturbations: a preliminary study.European journal of applied physiology · 2020Article
- The role of an auditory cue in generating anticipatory postural adjustments in response to an external perturbation.Experimental brain research · 2020Article
- Article
- Does structural leg-length discrepancy affect postural control? Preliminary study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2017Article
- Anticipatory Postural Adjustments associated with reaching movements are programmed according to the availability of visual information.Experimental brain research · 2017Article
- Multi-Finger Interaction and Synergies in Finger Flexion and Extension Force Production.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2017Article
- The role of visual feedback in respiratory muscle activation and pulmonary function.Journal of physical therapy science · 2015Article
- The effect of aging on anticipatory postural control.Experimental brain research · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) play an important role in the performance of many activities requiring the maintenance of vertical posture. However, little is known about how variation in the available visual information affects generation of APAs. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of different visual cues on APAs. Ten healthy young subjects were exposed to external perturbations induced at the shoulder level in standing while the level of visual information about the forthcoming perturbation was varied. The external perturbations were provided by an aluminum pendulum attached to the ceiling. The visual conditions were (1) dynamic cues (full vision and high-frequency strobe light), (2) static cues (low-frequency strobe light) and (3) no cues (eyes open in dark room). Electrical activity of the trunk and leg muscles and center of pressure displacements were recorded and quantified within the time intervals typical for APAs. The results showed that significantly larger APAs were generated in conditions with dynamic visual cues as compared to the conditions with static cues (p < 0.05). Finally, no APAs were observed in the condition where there was complete absence of any visual cues. Principal component analysis further revealed different muscle coupling patterns in the full vision and high-frequency strobe light conditions. These findings suggest the importance of using appropriate visual cues in the generation of APAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.