Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23064681›Full record

ArticleMolecular medicine reports2013

Clinical utility of the Xpert MRSA assay for early detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Ae-Chin Oh, Jin Kyung Lee, Ha Na Lee, Young Jun Hong, Yoon Hwan Chang, Seok-Il Hong, Dong Ho Kim

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02660554 (Rapid Diagnostic Testing to Guide Antibiotic Therapy in Drug Resistant Pneumonia), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02660554 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Rapid Diagnostic Testing to Guide Antibiotic Therapy in Drug Resistant Pneumonia

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorthwestern UniversityRan2016 to 2019Enrolled45ConditionsPneumonia, Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus AureusArmsPolymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Rapid diagnostic test and use of antibiotic against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in adult intensive care unit.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ae-Chin OhDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Nowon-gu, Seoul 139-706, Republic of Korea.
Jin Kyung Lee
Ha Na Lee
Young Jun Hong
Yoon Hwan Chang
Seok-Il Hong
Dong Ho Kim

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is responsible for many nosocomial and community-acquired infections, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. A practical way to limit the spread of MRSA is early detection and proper treatment. However, screening culture for MRSA typically requires 2-3 days. The Xpert MRSA assay (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) is a real-time polymerase chain reaction-based assay developed for screening an MRSA-specific DNA sequence within the staphylococcal cassette chromosome in 2 h. Lower respiratory tract specimens, such as transtracheal aspirates (TTAs) and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), are commonly obtained from intubated patients. Therefore, using the lower respiratory tract specimens with the Xpert MRSA assay may be a practical tool for patient care. We performed the Xpert MRSA assay on 108 TTA and 21 BALF specimens from 92 patients and compared the results to those obtained by culture. The two assays showed concordant results in 120 (93.0%) cases and discordant results in 9 (7.0%) cases, which were culture‑negative and Xpert MRSA-positive. Among the discordant cases, 5 patients developed culture-positive samples 2-15 days after the Xpert MRSA detected MRSA. We conclude that the Xpert MRSA assay is a rapid, sensitive and clinically useful test, particularly for the early detection of MRSA.

Indexed as

Reagent Kits, DiagnosticReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityStaphylococcal InfectionsReagent Kits, Diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID23064681
PMCPMC3572728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.