Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23064619›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2012

Correlation of immunohistochemical staining p63 and TTF-1 with EGFR and K-ras mutational spectrum and diagnostic reproducibility in non small cell lung carcinoma.

Erik Thunnissen, Evan Boers, Daniëlle A M Heideman, Katrien Grünberg, Dirk J Kuik, Arnold Noorduin, Matthijs van Oosterhout, Divera Pronk, Cees Seldenrijk, Hannie Sietsma and 7 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Prognostic and predictive biomarkers in lung cancer. A review.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2014
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Pulmonary adenocarcinoma histology.Translational lung cancer research · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Erik ThunnissenDepartment of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. e.thunnissen@vumc.nl
Evan Boers
Daniëlle A M Heideman
Katrien Grünberg
Dirk J Kuik
Arnold Noorduin
Matthijs van Oosterhout
Divera Pronk
Cees Seldenrijk
Hannie Sietsma
Egbert F Smit
Robertjan van Suylen
Jan von der Thusen
Bart Vrugt
Anne Wiersma
Birgit I Witte
Michael den Bakker
Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLMartini Ziekenhuis · NLSt. Antonius Ziekenhuis · NLErasmus MC · NLIsala · NLMaastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For treatment purposes, distinction between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma is important. The aim of this study is to examine the diagnostic accuracy on lung cancer small biopsies for the distinction between adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma and relate these to immunohistochemical and KRAS and EGFR mutation analysis. An interobserver study was performed on 110 prospectively collected biopsies obtained by bronchoscopy or transthoracic needle biopsy of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. The diagnosis was correlated with immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis for markers of adeno- (TTF1 and/or mucin positivity) and squamous cell differentiation (P63 and CK5/6) as well as KRAS and EGFR mutation analysis. Eleven observers independently read H&E-stained slides of 110 cases, resulting in a kappa value of 0.55 ± 0.10. The diagnosis non-small cell lung cancer not otherwise specified was given on average on 29.5 % of the biopsies. A high concordance was observed between hematoxylin-eosin-based consensus diagnosis (≥8/11 readings concordant) and IHC markers. In all cases with EGFR (n = 1) and KRAS (n = 20) mutations, adenodifferentiation as determined by IHC was present and p63 staining was absent. In 2 of 25 cases with a consensus diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma, additional stainings favored adenodifferentation, and a KRAS mutation was present. P63 is most useful for distinction between EGFR/KRAS mutation positive and negative patients. In the diagnostic work-up of non-small cell lung carcinoma the limited reproducibility on small biopsies is optimized with immunohistochemical analysis, resulting in reliable delineation for predictive analysis.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCarcinoma, Squamous CellDNA Mutational AnalysisEosine Yellowish-(YS)ErbB ReceptorsHematoxylinHumansImmunohistochemistryLung NeoplasmsMembrane ProteinsProspective StudiesProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)ras ProteinsReproducibility of ResultsCCDC59 protein, humanCKAP4 protein, humanEGFR protein, humanEosine Yellowish-(YS)ErbB ReceptorsHematoxylinKRAS protein, humanMembrane ProteinsProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)ras ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID23064619
OpenAlexW2073486784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.